“…The first type considers one pathway at a time and explores its important properties such as its robustness (Edwards and Palsson, 2000), steady states (Devloo et al, 2003;Garg et al, 2007;Ay et al, 2009b), modular structure (Lu et al, 2006;Schuster et al, 2002;Ay et al, 2010), network motifs (Milo et al, 298;Wernicke and Rasche, 2006;Grochow and Kellis, 2007), as well as its representation (Michal, 1998;Babur et al, 2010). The second type is the comparative approach which considers multiple pathways to identify their frequent subgraphs (Koyuturk et al, 2004;Qian and Yoon, 2009) and their alignments (Singh et al, 2008(Singh et al, , 2007Liao et al, 2009;Kalaev et al, 2008;Sharan et al, 2005;Kalaev et al, 2009;Dost et al, 2007;Flannick et al, 2006;Koyuturk et al, 2005;Pinter et al, 2005;Berg and Lassig, 2004;Dandekar et al, 1999;Tohsato and Nishimura, 2008;Tohsato et al, 2000;Cheng et al, 2009;Ay et al, 2008Ay et al, , 2009a. Alignment is a fundamental type of comparative analysis that aims to identify similar parts between pathways.…”