2007
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.001420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic rate of nocturnal incubation in female great tits,Parus major, in relation to clutch size measured in a natural environment

Abstract: SUMMARY To study the energetic costs of incubation in relation to clutch size,clutch sizes were manipulated and the metabolic rate of female great tits, Parus major (Linnaeus), during nocturnal incubation(MRinc) was measured using mobile oxygen analysers. Individuals were measured on consecutive nights while incubating their own or manipulated clutches. The experiment was performed under field conditions in order to place possible effects of clutch size manipulation within the context of other f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For incubation behaviour we also added clutch size and day of incubation as covariates. We included the female's clutch size as a covariate because larger clutches are energetically more expensive to incubate (Biebach, 1984;De Heij, Van der Graaf, Hafner, & Tinbergen, 2007). Incubation day (day 0 is the day of clutch completion) was included as a covariate since patterns of incubation attentiveness can vary over the incubation period in this species (Gorman & Nager, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For incubation behaviour we also added clutch size and day of incubation as covariates. We included the female's clutch size as a covariate because larger clutches are energetically more expensive to incubate (Biebach, 1984;De Heij, Van der Graaf, Hafner, & Tinbergen, 2007). Incubation day (day 0 is the day of clutch completion) was included as a covariate since patterns of incubation attentiveness can vary over the incubation period in this species (Gorman & Nager, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, when natural seasonal variation is controlled, birds breeding during periods of cold weather fail at higher rates. This could be due to increased energetic costs associated with colder temperatures (Haftorn, 1978;Ardia et al, 2009;Nord et al, 2010), which leads to reduced egg viability and decreased parental effort (de Heij et al, 2006(de Heij et al, , 2007. However, colder temperatures may also lead to reduced food supplies compounding potential energetic costs, even if parents may increase reproductive effort as costs increase (Ardia and Clotfelter, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, environmental factors, such as (seasonal changes in) ambient temperature (Webb 1987;Hatchwell et al 1999;Camfield and Martin 2009;Matysioková and Remeš 2010) may affect the rate at which the eggs cool down and require females to incubate more. In addition, characteristics of the clutch, such as number of eggs, may be correlated with male incubation feeding: females with a larger clutch may require more energy to incubate the eggs or may spend more time on incubation and less on foraging (de Heij et al 2007), so that males may need to feed females incubating larger clutches more frequently. Overall, females are expected to adjust nest attendance and males to adjust incubation feeding frequency in such a way that they shorten the incubation period (Hałupka 1994;Hatchwell et al 1999;Camfield and Martin 2009;Stein et al 2010), decrease developmental risks and/or maximize hatching and reproductive success (Lyon and Montgomerie 1985;Hatchwell et al 1999;Martin and Ghalambor 1999;Tulp and Schekkerman 2006;Stein et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%