Metabolism and Soil Water Viscosity Control Diel Patterns of Nitrate and DOC in a Low Order Temperate Stream

Abstract

We investigated diel dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrate (NO3−) dynamics in White Clay Creek, a third‐order stream in Pennsylvania, USA. High‐frequency DOC and NO3− concentrations were modeled from absorbance spectra collected with a deployable spectrophotometer. Periodicities of 24 hr in solute concentrations and streamflow were frequent throughout the year. To test potential drivers of diel oscillations, we focused on five periods with at least 5 days of clear diel changes that were not drastically influenced by high‐flow events. Maxima and minima of the diel variation in solute concentrations, and significant correlations between their daily amplitude and gross primary production (GPP) indicate that stream metabolism was the major driver diel oscillations in April (r = 0.86 and −0.87 for GPP vs. DOC and NO3−, respectively) and May (r = 0.86 and −0.90 for GPP vs. DOC and NO3−, respectively). In summer, drivers of daily oscillations of DOC and NO3− were unclear but likely influenced by stream metabolism. In winter, we observed no correlation between GPP and amplitude of daily concentration change, instead streamflow was the dominant driver via the viscosity effect (r = −0.92 and 0.89 for streamflow vs. DOC and NO3− respectively). As the hydraulic conductivity of the riparian soil increased throughout the daytime, the contribution of DOC‐rich and NO3−‐poor soil water to the stream relative to groundwater also increased. Results from this work highlight that watershed processes influence stream solutes on widely variable time scales, ranging from hours to centuries; and that underlying controls depend highly on seasonality.

Pulses within pulses: Concentration‐discharge relationships across temporal scales in a snowmelt‐dominated Rocky Mountain catchment

“…The baseflow timing of daytime DOC maxima and NO 3 -N minima (Figure 7) was consistent with in-stream primary production and coupled autotrophic assimilation of N (Heffernan & Cohen, 2010;Oviedo-Vargas et al, 2022;Roberts & Mulholland, 2007;Rode, Angelstein, et al, 2016;Sullivan et al, 1998). However, most of Como Creek is narrow and heavily shaded throughout the year, limiting light availability for photosynthesis (Savoy & Harvey, 2021).…”

“…Diel solute signals are often driven by a combination of hydrologic delivery and in‐stream biogeochemical processes (Hensley et al, 2017; McKnight & Bencala, 1990; Mulholland & Hill, 1997; Nimick et al, 2011; Oviedo‐Vargas et al, 2022), with the former often dominating during periods of high Q and the latter during periods of low flow (Hensley et al, 2019). Given the large volumes of water, short in‐stream residence times and cold‐water temperatures, we feel confident that variation in solute chemistry during the melt pulse is primarily driven by variation in delivery to the stream.…”