1951
DOI: 10.1042/bj0480192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolism of derivatives of toluene. 6. Tolunitriles, benzonitrile and some related compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3-and 4-Hydroxylation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile has now been demonstrated in vivo; hydroxylation is predominantly meta, owing to the inductive effect of the 2,6-dichloro atoms. The 2,6-dichloro substituents contribute to the rapid rate of hydroxylation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in vivo, since the slowness with which the metabolic products of benzonitrile and nitrobenzene are eliminated from the body has been attributed to difficulty associated with the hydroxylation of aromatic compounds that have meta-directing groups (Bray, Hybs & Thorpe, 1951;Smith, 1950;Smith & Williams, 1950). By analogy with chlorobenzene (Smith, Spencer & Williams, 1950) and naphthalene (Corner & Young, 1955), the possibility that hydroxylation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in vivo may involve intermediate formation of 2,6dichloro-3,4-dihydro-3,4-dihydroxybenzonitrile is attractive, since this diol might itself be formed from an epoxide precursor, which would also be expected to react with the thiol group of cysteine, glutathione or tissue proteins (Parke & Williams, 1958) to yield the two sulphur-containing acylamino acid metabolites that have been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3-and 4-Hydroxylation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile has now been demonstrated in vivo; hydroxylation is predominantly meta, owing to the inductive effect of the 2,6-dichloro atoms. The 2,6-dichloro substituents contribute to the rapid rate of hydroxylation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in vivo, since the slowness with which the metabolic products of benzonitrile and nitrobenzene are eliminated from the body has been attributed to difficulty associated with the hydroxylation of aromatic compounds that have meta-directing groups (Bray, Hybs & Thorpe, 1951;Smith, 1950;Smith & Williams, 1950). By analogy with chlorobenzene (Smith, Spencer & Williams, 1950) and naphthalene (Corner & Young, 1955), the possibility that hydroxylation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in vivo may involve intermediate formation of 2,6dichloro-3,4-dihydro-3,4-dihydroxybenzonitrile is attractive, since this diol might itself be formed from an epoxide precursor, which would also be expected to react with the thiol group of cysteine, glutathione or tissue proteins (Parke & Williams, 1958) to yield the two sulphur-containing acylamino acid metabolites that have been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction is a minor one, and its extent depends on the nature of the substituents in the benzene nucleus. With benzonitrile and o-tolunitrile, oxidation of the aromatic nucleus is the major pathway of metabolism, but at least 10% of benzonitrile and 25% of o-tolunitrile are metabolized by hydrolysis of the cyano group to carboxyl (Bray et al 1951). Less than 2% of the sterically hindered 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile is metabolized in vivo to 2,6-dichlorobenzamide plus 2,6-dichlorobenzoic acid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would seem that at least part of the increased excretion of glucuronic acid after administration of pentachloronitrobenzene must be due to a toxic effect such as has been observed with certain other compounds (cf. Bray, Hybs & Thorpe, 1951).…”
Section: I955 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because phenolic compounds are toxic, they are detoxified by glucuronidation in the liver and sulphurization in the colonic mucosa and then excreted as conjugate forms. [21][22][23] In this experiment, the most universal parameter affecting the amount of phenolic compounds was cecal pH that showed positive correlation with the amount of total phenol and total p-cresol in both the cecum and urine. Although the reduction in cecal pH was related to reduced production of phenolic compounds in the cecum, it is conceivable another factor may also be involved because a change in pH does not fully explain the reduction in phenolic compounds in the cecum and 24-h urine sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%