2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-007-0055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolite analysis for the comparison of irrigated and non-irrigated field grown tomato of varying genotype

Abstract: Every year the consequences of water deficit on crop yield and quality are profound. The observation that many wild species relatives of cultivated crops display a greater stress tolerance and the fact that the cultivated species generally display only a fraction of the allelic diversity available within the tomato clade suggest that crossing of wild species with elite cultivars could improve the stress physiology of modern crops. To assess this from the basis of chemical composition we applied an established … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabolite assignments: 1 alanine, 2 malate, 3 unknown 1 (2.97 ppm), 4 choline, 5 betaine, 6 sucrose, 7 fructose, 8 b-glucose, 9 a-glucose, 10 fumarate and 11 unknown 2 (6.75 ppm) (Color figure online) Commonly, the higher doses (10 and 50 lg l -1 ) of Cd induced the abundance of branched chain amino acids (valine, leucine and isoleucine), succinate, citrate, glucose, fructose and depletion of betaine and sucrose after 1 week of exposure. The increase in the branched chain amino acids is intriguing, which has also been observed in the Arabidopsis thaliana under dark condition and in the water-stressed tomato (Ishizaki et al 2005;Semel et al 2007). In the highest dose (50 lg l -1 ) of Cd-exposed samples, the other amino acids including glutamate, glutamine, arginine, tyrosine and phenylalanine were elevated as well, whilst only tryptophan was increased in the 10 lg l -1 Cd-treated samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Metabolite assignments: 1 alanine, 2 malate, 3 unknown 1 (2.97 ppm), 4 choline, 5 betaine, 6 sucrose, 7 fructose, 8 b-glucose, 9 a-glucose, 10 fumarate and 11 unknown 2 (6.75 ppm) (Color figure online) Commonly, the higher doses (10 and 50 lg l -1 ) of Cd induced the abundance of branched chain amino acids (valine, leucine and isoleucine), succinate, citrate, glucose, fructose and depletion of betaine and sucrose after 1 week of exposure. The increase in the branched chain amino acids is intriguing, which has also been observed in the Arabidopsis thaliana under dark condition and in the water-stressed tomato (Ishizaki et al 2005;Semel et al 2007). In the highest dose (50 lg l -1 ) of Cd-exposed samples, the other amino acids including glutamate, glutamine, arginine, tyrosine and phenylalanine were elevated as well, whilst only tryptophan was increased in the 10 lg l -1 Cd-treated samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…glucose, maltose, sucrose, trehalose and myo-inositol) being present at higher levels in the F1 hybrid and only a few of them (putrescine and fructose-6-phosphate) more abundant in M82 (Semel et al, 2007). In the cultivated tomato, M82, the stress strongly affected the content of many metabolites, with large increases in several amino acids (including proline, β-alanine, GABA, glutamate and glycine), fatty and organic acids (including TCA cycle intermediates), as well as sugars and sugar derivatives.…”
Section: H O S P H a T E S S U G A R A L C O H O L S A N D O T H E mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the basis of this observation, Semel et al (2007) compared the metabolic profile of tomato fruit pericarp from irrigated and non-irrigated field grown plants, belonging either to the cultivated tomato, Solanum lycopersicum (cv. M82), or to its interspecific hybrid with Solanum pennellii.…”
Section: Drought Stress Response In Crop Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GC-based metabolite profiling methods have been employed to investigate a phenotypic diversity of food crops (Davies 2007;Matsuda et al 2012), assess compositional variability due to the environmental impacts (Semel et al 2007), differentiate different input systems, i.e. conventional versus organic farming , as well as monitor the plant developmental process (Fait et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%