2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46687-3_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolite Named Entity Recognition: A Hybrid Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have described three new DL models, using different word embedding layers, that have both achieved state-ofthe-art performance (F1-score>0.89) for metabolite NER on a manually annotated dataset with OA metabolomics articles. Our DL models (F1-scores of 0.91, 0.90 and 0.89 for TABoLiSTM (BioBERT), TABoLiSTM (BERT) and MetaboListem, respectively) surpass by a considerable margin previous methods (using CRFs) for metabolite NER which achieved maximum F1-scores of 0.78 (8) and 0.87 (9). Our methods, compared to similar methods for chemical entity recognition (17,18,24) and metabolite NER (8,9), have the benefit of having been trained not only on abstracts and titles, but also on full-text paragraphs that are relevant for information retrieval from studies (results and discussion sections).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have described three new DL models, using different word embedding layers, that have both achieved state-ofthe-art performance (F1-score>0.89) for metabolite NER on a manually annotated dataset with OA metabolomics articles. Our DL models (F1-scores of 0.91, 0.90 and 0.89 for TABoLiSTM (BioBERT), TABoLiSTM (BERT) and MetaboListem, respectively) surpass by a considerable margin previous methods (using CRFs) for metabolite NER which achieved maximum F1-scores of 0.78 (8) and 0.87 (9). Our methods, compared to similar methods for chemical entity recognition (17,18,24) and metabolite NER (8,9), have the benefit of having been trained not only on abstracts and titles, but also on full-text paragraphs that are relevant for information retrieval from studies (results and discussion sections).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our DL models (F1-scores of 0.91, 0.90 and 0.89 for TABoLiSTM (BioBERT), TABoLiSTM (BERT) and MetaboListem, respectively) surpass by a considerable margin previous methods (using CRFs) for metabolite NER which achieved maximum F1-scores of 0.78 (8) and 0.87 (9). Our methods, compared to similar methods for chemical entity recognition (17,18,24) and metabolite NER (8,9), have the benefit of having been trained not only on abstracts and titles, but also on full-text paragraphs that are relevant for information retrieval from studies (results and discussion sections). The corpora these algorithms were trained and evaluated on are made available for future re-use and algorithm development, and to the best of our knowledge are the first of its kind for metabolomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting metabolite NER tool consisted of a hybrid strategy using dictionary-lookup and CRF-based tagger that, according to their evaluation, was able to recognize metabolite mentions with a balanced F-measure of 78.49% and precision of 83.02%. Similarly, another hybrid metabolite NER system combining mainly dictionary-lookup with CRFs was recently presented by Kongburan et al…”
Section: Integration Of Chemical and Biological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%