2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility of mash and pelleted diets for broilers determined under different methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AME and AMEn for wheats were calculated by TiO 2 marker using the following equations according to Roza et al. (2018) : where GE is the gross energy and N is nitrogen content, which is calculated by CP (crude content) = N content × 6.25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AME and AMEn for wheats were calculated by TiO 2 marker using the following equations according to Roza et al. (2018) : where GE is the gross energy and N is nitrogen content, which is calculated by CP (crude content) = N content × 6.25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability in estimating these ME values may be influenced by different factors. These factors include the methodology selected ( Farrell et al, 1991 ; West, 2018 ; Olukosi, 2021 ), excreta collection method and inert marker used ( Roza et al, 2018 ), age of the chickens ( Lessire et al, 1982 ; Sibbald, 1982 ; Bertechini et al, 2019 ), the composition of reference diet ( Veluri and Olukosi, 2020 ), time of adaptation to assay diets, and species and strain ( Spratt and Leeson, 1987 ; Bourdillon et al, 1990 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total collection takes more time and errors in recording excreta or feed intake can affect accuracy. The results of the partial collection analysis are influenced by the accuracy of laboratory analyses to recover the indigestible marker ( Roza et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards comparison between methodologies (Experiment 1), our data showed that when an indigestible marker was involved in ATTDP-m, comparable P digestibility values were obtained with ATTDP-tc. The full recovery of markers can be limiting when using such methodologies [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. This was not the case in our study, where the average recovery of TiO 2 in excreta in all pooled samples from Experiment 1 was 104 ± 11.0% (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%