“…In a typical metabolomics strategy, analytical data obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or mass spectrometry (MS) for complex mixtures ( e.g. , biofluids, tissues and cells) are handled and interpreted with the aid of multivariate statistical analysis (MVA). , Because local metabolic changes are believed to be critical for tissue regeneration, metabolomics of MSCs (through cell extracts or fingerprinting and culture media or footprinting) has already provided valuable information on metabolic adaptations associated with differentiation into bone, adipose tissue, or cartilage cells . Indeed, in recent years, several metabolomic studies have been carried out mostly through MS-based approaches and typically using bone marrow MSCs (BMMSCs). − These reports involve the promotion of osteogenic differentiation, either by media supplementation or specific physical properties (biomaterial nanotopography , or mechanical stimuli , ), the associated metabolic adaptations having been studied both in traditional in vitro conditions , and within specific biomaterials, such as nanostructured surfaces ,,− or scaffolds. ,, The results suggest that regardless of the osteoinductive method or culture conditions, osteogenic differentiation seems to be consistently associated with a generalized metabolic upregulation, often shown by the initial accumulation of amino acids, carbohydrates, nucleotides, or lipids, among other compounds. ,− Some reports suggest a subsequent metabolic reversal toward the end of the process, with differentiated cells acquiring a metabolic profile resembling that of primary osteoblasts. , In addition, MSC differentiation seems to lead to unique lineage-specific lipidic profiles, with osteoblastic membrane phenotypes containing longer and more polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs, such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)) compared with undifferentiated cells .…”