2018
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolomics 20 years on: what have we learned and what hurdles remain?

Abstract: The term metabolome was coined in 1998, by analogy to genome, transcriptome and proteome. The first research papers using the terms metabolomics, metabonomics, metabolic profiling or metabolite profiling were published shortly thereafter. In this short review we reflect on the major achievements brought about by the use of these approaches, and document the knowledge and technology gaps that are currently constraining its further development. Finally, we detail why we think that the time is ripe to refocus our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
119
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(165 reference statements)
2
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike other omics technologies, no single analytical platform is capable of analyzing all metabolites simultaneously due to their extreme complexity and huge chemical diversity. Recent developments in analytical chemistry platforms such as hyphenating mass spectrometry with gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC) or capillary electrophoresis (CE), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy have led to a highly efficient set up for metabolome analysis [20], however, these do not yet reach comprehensibility [21]. Although huge datasets are generated from these instruments, the evolution of chemometrics and multivariate data analysis algorithms provides a powerful tool for extracting useful information from such high dimensionality results [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike other omics technologies, no single analytical platform is capable of analyzing all metabolites simultaneously due to their extreme complexity and huge chemical diversity. Recent developments in analytical chemistry platforms such as hyphenating mass spectrometry with gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC) or capillary electrophoresis (CE), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy have led to a highly efficient set up for metabolome analysis [20], however, these do not yet reach comprehensibility [21]. Although huge datasets are generated from these instruments, the evolution of chemometrics and multivariate data analysis algorithms provides a powerful tool for extracting useful information from such high dimensionality results [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much effort has been made to dissect metabolic pathways, including screening of mutant libraries (Li et al ., ; Yonekura‐Sakakibara et al ., ), analysis of gene families (Yamamura et al ., ; Sadre et al ., ), and comparative genomics studies (Denoeud et al ., ; Huang et al ., ). To obtain deeper insights into genetic and biochemical bases of diversity in the metabolome and to artificially produce natural products with synthetic biology, linkage mapping, and association mapping based on next‐generation sequencing have been applied to metabolomics studies (Luo, ; Alseekh and Fernie, ). By discussing the development of genome‐wide association study (GWAS) and the rise of the metabolic diversity, we review two of the pre‐conditions for metabolic GWAS (mGWAS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first papers on metabolomics in plants – the comprehensive description of the small molecule complement of the cell – were published over 20 years ago (Katona et al ., ; Fiehn et al ., ; Roberts, ; Roessner et al ., ; Aharoni et al ., ; Le Gall et al ., ; Weckwerth, ; Deferenez et al ., ; Saito and Matsuda, ); however, current methodologies only cover a small percentage of the 200 000–1 000 000 metabolites anticipated in the plant kingdom (Dixon and Strack, ; Rai et al ., ). Three methodologies are commonly used for plant metabolomics: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) (Obata and Fernie, ), with LC‐MS providing the most comprehensive outcomes (Alseekh and Fernie, ). Twin improvements afforded by ultra‐performance LC (UPLC) and high‐resolution mass spectrometry rendered this technique even more powerful with regards to resolution, sensitivity and throughput (Fernie and Tohge, ).…”
Section: Metabolomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%