2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metachronous hepatic metastases from gastric carcinoma: A multicentric survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
63
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant benefit that we found in our patient group with metachronous metastasis was not found in the other studies [24][25][26][27]. The influence of solitary and multiple metastases on survival is controversial.…”
Section: Comparative Literaturecontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The significant benefit that we found in our patient group with metachronous metastasis was not found in the other studies [24][25][26][27]. The influence of solitary and multiple metastases on survival is controversial.…”
Section: Comparative Literaturecontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…This finding is not consistent with other studies [17,18] . However, we have not found the proper explanation for this phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Those results were maintained after propensity matching for the differences between groups. Other publications from the Far East [4][5][6][7], and some Western centers [14][15][16][17], have also suggested the safety of hepatectomy for gastric cancer liver metastases in selected patients. The results of this study also parallel the outcomes of hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases, where surgical resection is more common and is considered the standard of care for isolated hepatic metastases [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%