2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.17.448865
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source tracking

Abstract: Fecal material in the environment is a primary source of pathogens that cause waterborne diseases and affect over a billion people worldwide. Microbial source tracking (MST) assays based on single genes (e.g., 16S rRNA) do not always provide the resolution needed to attribute fecal contamination sources. In this work, we used dialysis bag mesocosms simulating a freshwater habitat that were spiked separately with cow, pig, or human feces to monitor the decay of host-specific fecal signals over time with metagen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The human gut microbiome represents the best studied fecal source with work summarizing our understanding of its extant species diversity estimating it is probably comprised of about 3,000 reoccurring (i.e., excluding singletons) species globally 20 . Work examining human feces at the metagenomic level previously reported sequence diversity values less than those we found for our wastewater samples but greater than those of the dog and cat fecal slurries 34,35 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The human gut microbiome represents the best studied fecal source with work summarizing our understanding of its extant species diversity estimating it is probably comprised of about 3,000 reoccurring (i.e., excluding singletons) species globally 20 . Work examining human feces at the metagenomic level previously reported sequence diversity values less than those we found for our wastewater samples but greater than those of the dog and cat fecal slurries 34,35 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…20 Surveys of human feces at the metagenomic level previously reported sequence diversity values less than those we found for our wastewater samples but greater than those of the dog and cat fecal slurries. 38,39 Unsurprisingly, this suggests there are a substantial number of species missing from the databases of many of the sources we examined. Indeed, no source saw read capture rates exceed 60% in our noncompetitive read mapping exercises (Figure 3).…”
Section: T H Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesocosm sampling, DNA extraction and subsequent qPCR analysis occurred as described previously in Suttner et al (35). Briefly, water samples were passed through 0.45 μm poly-carbonate (PC) membranes and stored at -80 °C in 2 mL screw cap bead tubes until processed (within 1-3 months).…”
Section: Sample Collection Mesocosm Setup and Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Template DNAs were run undiluted or diluted 5-fold (to remove the effect of PCR inhibitors) depending on the expected marker concentration and quality of each sample. Further details on qPCR reaction set up and standard plasmids for absolute quantification are provided in Suttner et al (35) and reiterated within the supplement here (Supplement Table S1). To test for extraneous DNA and potential contamination from sample handling, 50 mL of sterile PBS was also filtered onto PC membranes and processed following the same DNA extraction at every sampling time point as described above.…”
Section: Sample Collection Mesocosm Setup and Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%