2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenomic analysis of microbial community and its role in bioelectrokinetic remediation of tannery contaminated soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water sample consists of the most abundant bacterial OTU class (%) as follows ( Figure 1 ): Fusobacterium (22), Nitrospria (21), Tepidiforma (13), Bacteroides (12), Arcobacter (7), Clostridioides (6), Treponema (6), Flavobacterium (5), Bifidobacterium (4), and Hyphomicrobium (4). The water sample contains diverse microbial genera ( Figure 1 ) such as Corynebacterium, Actinomyces, Streptomyces, Collinsella, Olsenella, Eggerthella, Baekduia, Clostridioides, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Xanthobacter, Erythrobacter, Sulfuritalea, Acinetobacter, Sulfurivermis, Desulfovibrio, Desulfomicrobium, Desulfotomaculum, Geobacter, Bacteroides, Fibrobacter, Pseudorhodoplanes, Nitrospira, Fimbriimonas, Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, Clostridium , and Staphylococcus ( Figure 1 ) (Prakash et al, 2021 ). The metabolic activates of cooling tower water in the bar graphs representing microbial community composition revealed metagenomes at taxonomic levels in the cooling tower wastewater: (a) phylum, (b) class, (c) order, (d) family, and (e) genus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The water sample consists of the most abundant bacterial OTU class (%) as follows ( Figure 1 ): Fusobacterium (22), Nitrospria (21), Tepidiforma (13), Bacteroides (12), Arcobacter (7), Clostridioides (6), Treponema (6), Flavobacterium (5), Bifidobacterium (4), and Hyphomicrobium (4). The water sample contains diverse microbial genera ( Figure 1 ) such as Corynebacterium, Actinomyces, Streptomyces, Collinsella, Olsenella, Eggerthella, Baekduia, Clostridioides, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Xanthobacter, Erythrobacter, Sulfuritalea, Acinetobacter, Sulfurivermis, Desulfovibrio, Desulfomicrobium, Desulfotomaculum, Geobacter, Bacteroides, Fibrobacter, Pseudorhodoplanes, Nitrospira, Fimbriimonas, Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, Clostridium , and Staphylococcus ( Figure 1 ) (Prakash et al, 2021 ). The metabolic activates of cooling tower water in the bar graphs representing microbial community composition revealed metagenomes at taxonomic levels in the cooling tower wastewater: (a) phylum, (b) class, (c) order, (d) family, and (e) genus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before PCR amplification, the extracted DNA from the samples was subjected to NanoDrop and GEL Check. The NanoDrop readings of 260/280 at an approximate value of 1.8–2 are used to evaluate the quality of the DNA (Prakash et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worldwide, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are known to promote plant growth attributes by direct and indirect mechanisms such as the production of phytohormones (indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinin, and gibberellic acid, P solubilization, siderophore production, and nitrogen fixation) and promote the mineral nutrient uptake (Ali and Pati 2023). PGPR are widely used for increasing sustainable agricultural productivity as well as enhancing soil fertility and health (Prakash et al 2021). In contemporary investigations, the synergistic interaction between Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mining waste has been the subject of scientific inquiry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are numerous methods to clean up Cr(VI) contamination from wastewater, including bioremediation [ 46 ], precipitation [ 3 ], photocatalytic reduction [ 31 ],membrane treatment [ 21 ], oxidation filtration [ 63 ], electrochemical [ 33 ] and adsorption methods [ 10 , 12 , 53 , 55 ]. However, it was found that some treatment methods were pricy, challenging, and also produced dangerous secondary contaminants [ 40 , 66 ]. Adsorption has been called the most promising and well-liked treatment strategy because of its accessibility, improved removal effectiveness, and generally straightforward operation [ 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%