2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12064-008-0028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metagenomics and the niche concept

Abstract: The metagenomics approach has revolutionised the fields of bacterial diversity, ecology and evolution, as well as derived applications like bioremediation and obtaining bioproducts. A further associated conceptual change has also occurred since in the metagenomics methodology the species is no longer the unit of study, but rather partial genome arrangements or even isolated genes. In spite of this, concepts coming from ecological and evolutionary fields traditionally centred on the species, like the concept of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of N fertilization and OM type on nirS ‐denitrifier community structure were always interactive (Table ). These results are consistent with the theory that microbial communities are structured by multidimensional niches (as described by Marco, and Eisenhauer et al ., ). Generally, all the explanations posited above to describe resource regulation of microbial community structure relate to the selection of individual taxa, or whole populations, based upon variations in their ‘trophic strategies’ and the recognition that bacteria have evolved a wide range of capabilities with respect to growth and survival (Tiedje et al ., ; Fierer et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The effects of N fertilization and OM type on nirS ‐denitrifier community structure were always interactive (Table ). These results are consistent with the theory that microbial communities are structured by multidimensional niches (as described by Marco, and Eisenhauer et al ., ). Generally, all the explanations posited above to describe resource regulation of microbial community structure relate to the selection of individual taxa, or whole populations, based upon variations in their ‘trophic strategies’ and the recognition that bacteria have evolved a wide range of capabilities with respect to growth and survival (Tiedje et al ., ; Fierer et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The increase of less dominant bacteria in the absence or reduction of dominant bacteria is a typical mode of action in the development of complex bacterial communities. This model is called "niche concept", although many different definitions of this concept exist [21,22]. It is conceivable that the reduction of dominant members of a bacterial community will lead to the colonization with other members, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, genetic isolation, rather than parasitism (Zomorodipour and Andersson, 1999; Moran and Wernegreen, 2000; Moran, 2002), has a greater impact on genome reduction. Species complexes may have many different genomic repertoires and can therefore produce alternative phenotypes that are better adapted to their environment (Marco, 2008). According to Lawrence (2002), HGT is the main source of new metabolic abilities for microbial habitat colonization.…”
Section: Sympatric and Allopatric Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%