2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-010-0428-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaheuristics and exact methods to solve a multiobjective parallel machines scheduling problem

Abstract: This paper deals with a multiobjective parallel machines scheduling problem. It consists in scheduling n independent jobs on m identical parallel machines. The job data such as processing times, release dates, due dates and sequence dependent setup times are considered. The goal is to optimize two different objectives: the makespan and the total tardiness. A mixed integer linear program is proposed to model the studied problem. As this problem is NPhard in the strong sense, a metaheuristic method which is the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [20] proposed metaheuristics and exact methods to solve a multiobjective parallel machines scheduling (MoPMS) problem, Pm|s i j , r j |C max , T j in which consists in scheduling n independent jobs on m identical parallel proposed machines and the job data such as processing times, release dates, due dates and sequence dependent setup times are considered where s i j and r j are the sequence dependent setup times if job j is the immediate successor of the job i on the same machine and the release of job j, respectively and C max , T j are the makespan and the tardiness of job j. They formulated a mixed integer linear program (MILP) model for the MoPMS problem for solving it by CPLEX solver and proposed the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (FLC-NSGA-II) coupled with a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) to solve the problem.…”
Section: Parallel Machine Scheduling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al [20] proposed metaheuristics and exact methods to solve a multiobjective parallel machines scheduling (MoPMS) problem, Pm|s i j , r j |C max , T j in which consists in scheduling n independent jobs on m identical parallel proposed machines and the job data such as processing times, release dates, due dates and sequence dependent setup times are considered where s i j and r j are the sequence dependent setup times if job j is the immediate successor of the job i on the same machine and the release of job j, respectively and C max , T j are the makespan and the tardiness of job j. They formulated a mixed integer linear program (MILP) model for the MoPMS problem for solving it by CPLEX solver and proposed the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (FLC-NSGA-II) coupled with a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) to solve the problem.…”
Section: Parallel Machine Scheduling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the fuzzy logic is to better set the crossover and the mutation probabilities in order to update the search ability as demonstrated in hybrid genetic algorithm (HGA) by Yun and Gen [16] as introducing in Subsection 3.2 Fuzzy Logic Controller for Tuning Parameters and also auto-tuning strategy for balancing between exploration and exploitation by Lin and Gen [21]. The experimental results for the MoPMS problem shown the advantages and the efficiency of the FLC-NSGA-II [20].…”
Section: Parallel Machine Scheduling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of the controller is the variation of the two probabilities 鈭唒 c and 鈭唒 m . In the works of [28], [29], [30], [31] and [32], the authors have proposed a combination of the fuzzy logic and different genetic algorithms to solve different optimization problems.…”
Section: Fuzzy Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two fuzzy logic controllers are proposed in this study to enhance the crossover probability and the mutation probability respectively. The details of the three parts are presented in our previous work [31], such as the settings of the membership functions, the linguistic terms and the decision tables.…”
Section: Fuzzy Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation