2002
DOI: 10.1086/341377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Abundances and Kinematics of Bright Metal-poor Giants Selected from the LSE Survey: Implications for the Metal-weak Thick Disk

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(67 reference statements)
3
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal-poor stars probe the early evolution of the Galaxy and give clues to the origin of its first components. Among the MW components containing a large fraction of metal-poor stars are the thick disk (originally known as Intermediate Pop II stars and later reidentified by Yoshii 1982;Gilmore & Reid 1983) via its metal-poor extension (the metal-weak thick disk, MWTD, Morrison 1993;Chiba & Beers 2000;Beers et al 2002), globular clusters, dwarf MW satellite galaxies, and the halo, possibly separating into inner-and outer-halo components (Hartwick 1987;Sommer-Larsen & Zhen 1990;Allen et al 1991;Kinman et al 1994;Norris 1994;Carollo et al 2007Carollo et al , 2010Beers et al 2012), but containing sub-populations of globular clusters (Zinn 1993) and fields stars accreted from hierarchical formation, which undoubtedly played a key role in the formation of the halo. A long standing problem is whether and how these different populations may be discriminated from one another by their spatial, kinematical, and chemical distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal-poor stars probe the early evolution of the Galaxy and give clues to the origin of its first components. Among the MW components containing a large fraction of metal-poor stars are the thick disk (originally known as Intermediate Pop II stars and later reidentified by Yoshii 1982;Gilmore & Reid 1983) via its metal-poor extension (the metal-weak thick disk, MWTD, Morrison 1993;Chiba & Beers 2000;Beers et al 2002), globular clusters, dwarf MW satellite galaxies, and the halo, possibly separating into inner-and outer-halo components (Hartwick 1987;Sommer-Larsen & Zhen 1990;Allen et al 1991;Kinman et al 1994;Norris 1994;Carollo et al 2007Carollo et al , 2010Beers et al 2012), but containing sub-populations of globular clusters (Zinn 1993) and fields stars accreted from hierarchical formation, which undoubtedly played a key role in the formation of the halo. A long standing problem is whether and how these different populations may be discriminated from one another by their spatial, kinematical, and chemical distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stars are often selected for kinematical study by their metallicity ([Fe/H] in the range -0.5 and -1 dex) or for chemical study by their kinematics (rotational lag behind the LSR taken to be 20-60 km s −1 and larger). However, there is strong evidence for both the extremely metal-week tail to [Fe/H] below -1.6 dex (Beers et al 2002) and the high-metallicity tail extending to super-solar values (Bensby et al 2003) in the distribution of the thick-disk field stars, which indicates that [Fe/H] is less discriminant than velocities to separate this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could not see a significant peak at around the period of the RV variation. the infrared dust emission maps of Schlegel et al (1998) and was calibrated according to Beers et al (2002). Assuming the extinction to reddening ratio to be 3.1, the interstellar extinction was found to be at most A V = 0.047.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%