2018
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2018.2866561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Additive Manufactured Freeform Antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical formulas are incomplete because in the deduction process of (4) and (5), some simplifications and approximations as indicated by Reference 22 are considered. Thus, it can be explained why there are slight differences between the ideal E/H patterns (no tolerance) obtained by (4) and (5) and HFSS, especially in the negative hemisphere. All four tolerances are thus analyzed using HFSS; only the L/W tolerance are analyzed by the proposed IA-based approach and compared with the results of HFSS.…”
Section: Effect Of L/w Tolerance On E/h Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classical formulas are incomplete because in the deduction process of (4) and (5), some simplifications and approximations as indicated by Reference 22 are considered. Thus, it can be explained why there are slight differences between the ideal E/H patterns (no tolerance) obtained by (4) and (5) and HFSS, especially in the negative hemisphere. All four tolerances are thus analyzed using HFSS; only the L/W tolerance are analyzed by the proposed IA-based approach and compared with the results of HFSS.…”
Section: Effect Of L/w Tolerance On E/h Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A freeform spherical helix folded dipole antenna with thin, overhanging wires has been fabricated without support structures using electron beam melting. 4 The 3D printing fabrication of heterogeneous antenna (more than one material, such as, a patch antenna) is more complex compared with the methods used to fabricate the antennas mentioned above. One feasible method starts by 3D printing the dielectric core, and then metallizing the inner or outer surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, a distinct characteristic of 3‐D printed antenna is the architectural complexity, which can be hardly realized by those conventional processing crafts and breaks the typical design thought. For example, 3‐D printed torus knot antenna was proposed in Reference 8; dielectric helical antenna and lens antenna made by 3‐D printing technology were reported in References 9 and 10; 3‐D printed fractal and freeform antennas were designed in References 11 and 12. However, as another unique feature of 3‐D printing, the fully integrated manufacture has been seldom involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the antenna fabrication process, unavoidable geometric and material errors will ultimately affect the element patterns and array patterns. More specifically, some antennas can be fabricated by a novel technology (e.g., 3-D printing), which has the advantage of achieving a complex structure with low cost and high efficiency [13,14]. However, relative to conventional mechanical fabrication methods, this approach can produce lower precision and homogeneity [12,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%