1979
DOI: 10.1016/0378-7753(79)80001-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal/air batteries: Their status and potential — a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 188 , 189 ] Another case is a combination of both a mechanically and an electrically rechargeable approach, that is, a slurry cell. [190][191][192] Such a cell uses a zinc suspension in an alkaline electrolyte. Besides the abovementioned charging methods, Wen et al suggested that the introduction of propanol oxidation as a counter electrode reaction enhanced the electrical energy utilization.…”
Section: Design Of Zinc-air Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 188 , 189 ] Another case is a combination of both a mechanically and an electrically rechargeable approach, that is, a slurry cell. [190][191][192] Such a cell uses a zinc suspension in an alkaline electrolyte. Besides the abovementioned charging methods, Wen et al suggested that the introduction of propanol oxidation as a counter electrode reaction enhanced the electrical energy utilization.…”
Section: Design Of Zinc-air Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary metal/ air batteries were already at the center of attention a few decades ago, with the fi rst review by Blurton and Sammells dating back to 1979. [ 5 ] At the time, the authors did not see practical vehicle applications for the Li/air cell chemistry, as opposed to then more promising Zn/air batteries. They did, however, recognize the high power density that could be achieved with such a system, thanks to the 3 V open-circuit voltage, as well as the very high theoretical gravimetric energy density that could be reached with Li 2 O as discharge product (at the time, the optimistic value of 11 148 W h kg −1 was provided).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Iron-air secondary battery is expected to have high theoretical energy density (1228 Wh kg ¹1 ), and efforts have been progressed for novel power source of electric vehicle. 1,[3][4][5] Practically the low utility of iron is one of the main reasons for unexpected low energy density, likely due to the passivation of active mass by the coverage of insulate oxidation product Fe(OH) x during discharge process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%