Elements and Their Compounds in the Environment 2004
DOI: 10.1002/9783527619634.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal and Ceramic Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this matter does not concern potential toxic effects of implantable biomedical devices. Moreover, these alloys do not contain vanadium, which has been shown to induce some cytotoxic effects in vanadium-enriched alloys [4,5,36,37,50]. The present experiences confirm that the 4% vanadium content in the Ti6Al4V alloy is not high enough or is physically so well integrated in this alloy that it does not generate any unwanted biological effect in any of the cell culture systems used.…”
Section: The Role Of the Other Alloy Compoundssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, this matter does not concern potential toxic effects of implantable biomedical devices. Moreover, these alloys do not contain vanadium, which has been shown to induce some cytotoxic effects in vanadium-enriched alloys [4,5,36,37,50]. The present experiences confirm that the 4% vanadium content in the Ti6Al4V alloy is not high enough or is physically so well integrated in this alloy that it does not generate any unwanted biological effect in any of the cell culture systems used.…”
Section: The Role Of the Other Alloy Compoundssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the second case, all osteoblasts adhere on the material surface in tight contact and are subsequently directly exposed to the chemical surface compounds. The existing extracellular matrix is not strong or tight enough to hinder the passage of released cytotoxic ions such as Cr, Ni or Co [36,37], although there could exist doubts whether in vitro proliferation differences of around 20% for CEM (between stainless steel and cp-Ti or Ti6Al4V) really represent true in vivo response. The difference rises to 60% for osteoblasts.…”
Section: Cell Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have to note the undesirable behavior of conventional stent material, i.e. stainless steel, which is dominated by its nickel component; this induces redox reaction and hydrolysis by electron or proton exchange and forms metallo‐organic molecular complexes while interacting with living tissue 38. Because none of the above mentioned reactions are observed with titanium, the application of the titanium‐based alloys in stents has been highly recommended 39.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stainless steel, which is dominated by its nickel component; this induces redox reaction and hydrolysis by electron or proton exchange and forms metallo-organic molecular complexes while interacting with living tissue. 38 Because none of the above mentioned reactions are observed with titanium, the application of the titanium-based alloys in stents has been highly recommended. 39 However, some studies implied potential thrombogenicity of titanium 40 and its surface characteristics should be further improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%