“…Regarding artifact size, the standard nonoptimized sequence produced the largest peri-implant signal void, and each optimization (oBW, VAT, oBW-VAT, and SEMAC) resulted in artifact size reduction in both phantoms, which is consistent with findings at lower field strengths 16,18,27,42 . However, at 7-T MRI, only the combination of oBW and VAT (oBW-VAT) as well as SEMAC produced a significantly smaller peri-implant signal void for all image contrasts (T1-w, T2-w, and IM-w) compared with the nonoptimized sequence (STA), whereas at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI, basic techniques such as increasing the receive bandwidth alone also have the potential for a significant signal void reduction compared with nonoptimized sequences 33,50 …”