2017
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging Around Arthroplasty Implants

Abstract: High receiver BW is the most effective parameter for reduction of arthroplasty implant-induced metal artifact on MRI scans, whereas in contradiction to prevalent notions, long echo trains fail to reduce implant-related metal artifacts, but in fact cause degradation of image quality around the implant with resultant larger appearing total metal artifacts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding artifact size, the standard nonoptimized sequence produced the largest peri-implant signal void, and each optimization (oBW, VAT, oBW-VAT, and SEMAC) resulted in artifact size reduction in both phantoms, which is consistent with findings at lower field strengths 16,18,27,42 . However, at 7-T MRI, only the combination of oBW and VAT (oBW-VAT) as well as SEMAC produced a significantly smaller peri-implant signal void for all image contrasts (T1-w, T2-w, and IM-w) compared with the nonoptimized sequence (STA), whereas at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI, basic techniques such as increasing the receive bandwidth alone also have the potential for a significant signal void reduction compared with nonoptimized sequences 33,50 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding artifact size, the standard nonoptimized sequence produced the largest peri-implant signal void, and each optimization (oBW, VAT, oBW-VAT, and SEMAC) resulted in artifact size reduction in both phantoms, which is consistent with findings at lower field strengths 16,18,27,42 . However, at 7-T MRI, only the combination of oBW and VAT (oBW-VAT) as well as SEMAC produced a significantly smaller peri-implant signal void for all image contrasts (T1-w, T2-w, and IM-w) compared with the nonoptimized sequence (STA), whereas at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI, basic techniques such as increasing the receive bandwidth alone also have the potential for a significant signal void reduction compared with nonoptimized sequences 33,50 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In summary, the findings in this study indicate no significant overall metal artifact reduction of either oBW or of VAT alone compared with standard nonoptimized TSE sequences at 7-T MRI. In contradiction to these findings, oBW alone at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI has been shown to significantly reduce image distortions 18,33,50 . An explanation for this discrepancy between ultra-high field MRI and lower field strengths may be that an increase of the receive bandwidth to around 500 Hz/pixel at 7-T MRI may be insufficient to yield a significant artifact reduction, and even higher receive bandwidths (>>500 Hz/pixel) might be needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such artifacts were visible on a few SPGR images. Fortunately, UTE sequences are less prone to susceptibility artifacts of this kind (35, 36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MRI is not the most common test used to evaluate treatment options and ONFH during postoperative FNF follow-up. MRIs are affected by metal implants, which may cause potential internal fixation losses and thermal effect (43). MRI tests are more expensive, take longer, and require the radiologist to have a higher level of diagnostic experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%