2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal artifact reduction techniques in musculoskeletal CT-imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was striking that stainless steel 2 produced more intense artifacts than the thicker stainless steel 3 while this was not the case for titanium. This result was caused by the sharp edges between the high attenuating second steel implant and low attenuating background, which amplify metal artifacts due to so called edge effects [26]. Although the image contrast in 120 kVp and 70 keV images is comparable, this was not the case for the artifact intensities determined by Fourier analysis where 70 keV images were more distorted than 120 kVp images.…”
Section: Fourier Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was striking that stainless steel 2 produced more intense artifacts than the thicker stainless steel 3 while this was not the case for titanium. This result was caused by the sharp edges between the high attenuating second steel implant and low attenuating background, which amplify metal artifacts due to so called edge effects [26]. Although the image contrast in 120 kVp and 70 keV images is comparable, this was not the case for the artifact intensities determined by Fourier analysis where 70 keV images were more distorted than 120 kVp images.…”
Section: Fourier Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For several implants either VMI and MAR as standalone approaches have been successfully used to reduce artifacts, e.g. total hip replacements, spinal fixation hardware, contrast media, and dental implants 12,13,[22][23][24]27,28 . This aspect is highly relevant as combination of both approaches is only available in dual-energy CT systems which allow for row data-based reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), but clinically used are mainly conventional single-energy CT systems, thereby MAR as a standalone post processing approach has the advantage of a higher availability also in conventional CT systems 12,13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altering tube current and voltage and/or applying narrow collimation can reduce metal artifacts, but mostly also increases radiation exposure 11 . Recently, postprocessing iterative metal artifact reduction algorithms (MAR) became available and showed reliable artifact reduction without impact on total applied radiation dose 12,13 . MAR have been reported to yield effective artifact reduction in patients with larger orthopaedic implants [12][13][14] , and smaller implants, such as dental or intracranial implants [15][16][17] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), however, can be used to decrease beam-hardening artifacts related to metal. 5,20,21 In the clinical setting, iMAR reconstructions can be obtained after image acquisition, whereas the decision to use DECT for metal artifact reduction must be made before image acquisition. 20 MRI allows for excellent evaluation of osseous, implant, and soft tissue structures, provided that metal artifact reduction techniques are used successfully.…”
Section: Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%