2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0162-0134(01)00223-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-binding properties of phytochelatin-related peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In wheat, phytochelatins bound 82% of the Cd in roots, 19% in young leaves and 12% in old leaves, suggesting the speciality of PC-based Cd sequesteration varies with tissues even in the same plant (Marentes & Rauser, 2007). And it's demonstrated that the chemical structure of thiol and carboxyl groups is essential for the metal-binding ability and formation of a Cd-PCs complex (Satofuka et al, 2001). There are two types of Cd-PC complexes produced during Cd sequesteration: lowmolecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wheat, phytochelatins bound 82% of the Cd in roots, 19% in young leaves and 12% in old leaves, suggesting the speciality of PC-based Cd sequesteration varies with tissues even in the same plant (Marentes & Rauser, 2007). And it's demonstrated that the chemical structure of thiol and carboxyl groups is essential for the metal-binding ability and formation of a Cd-PCs complex (Satofuka et al, 2001). There are two types of Cd-PC complexes produced during Cd sequesteration: lowmolecular-weight (LMW) and high-molecular-weight (HMW).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCs have the common structure (␥-GluCys) n Gly, where n ϭ 2 Ϫ 11, although PC 2 and PC 3 are the most common (Cobbett, 2000;Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002). There is strong evidence that PCs complex metal(loid) ions, for which they have high affinity, in plant extracts (Mehra et al, 1996a(Mehra et al, , 1996bBae and Mehra, 1997;Leopold and Gunther, 1997;Leopold et al, 1998;Pickering et al, 1999;Satofuka et al, 2001;Cruz et al, 2002;Doreak and Krezel, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since GSH was not utilized for PC synthesis, its enhanced accumulation must have constituted another advantage for plants, e.g., for direct metal chelation (metal inactivation) or for diminishing the deleterious effects of metals, such as oxidative stress. The latter seems more probable as GSH is regarded as a rather weak metal chelator (Satofuka et al 2001) but a key player in the cell antioxidative system and in maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis (Jozefczak et al 2012). Interestingly, both under the unpolluted and polluted soil conditions, higher GSH levels were found in the NM ecotype, supporting its role in basal metal tolerance but not in enhanced adaptive tolerance.…”
Section: Is Metal Tolerance Related To Metal Accumulation?mentioning
confidence: 97%