2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal etching method for preparing porous graphene as high performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the adsorption and desorption behavior at low relative pressure (P/P 0 ) (0–0.05), the adsorption volume increases sharply in the high pressure zone (0.8–1.0), showing that there is a large number of macropores in the 3DGA, which also conforms to the results of the magnified SEM images (Figure b). Compared with some carbon nanomaterials recently reported, 3DGA exhibits a larger specific surface area of 433.0 m 2 g −1 , which is mainly derived from the contribution of mesopores and micropores, illustrating its very rich pore structure . The macropores in 3DGA cannot be reflected in the specific surface area value, but their existence may facilitate the impregnation of the electrolyte in 3DGA, thus enhancing the electrochemical performance of 3DGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the adsorption and desorption behavior at low relative pressure (P/P 0 ) (0–0.05), the adsorption volume increases sharply in the high pressure zone (0.8–1.0), showing that there is a large number of macropores in the 3DGA, which also conforms to the results of the magnified SEM images (Figure b). Compared with some carbon nanomaterials recently reported, 3DGA exhibits a larger specific surface area of 433.0 m 2 g −1 , which is mainly derived from the contribution of mesopores and micropores, illustrating its very rich pore structure . The macropores in 3DGA cannot be reflected in the specific surface area value, but their existence may facilitate the impregnation of the electrolyte in 3DGA, thus enhancing the electrochemical performance of 3DGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Compared with some carbon nanomaterials recently reported, 3DGA exhibits a larger specific surface area of 433.0 m 2 g À 1 , which is mainly derived from the contribution of mesopores and micropores, illustrating its very rich pore structure. [46][47][48][49] The macropores in 3DGA cannot be reflected in the specific surface area value, but their existence may facilitate the impregnation of the electrolyte in 3DGA, thus enhancing the electrochemical performance of 3DGA. In contrast, the comparative GP (Figure 6b) has a much smaller specific surface area of 60.6 m 2 g À 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the fabrications of PG have involved high‐energy physical techniques, bottom‐up synthetic approaches via aryl–aryl coupling reactions, chemical etching by strong alkalis, high‐temperature carbothermic reduction, metal etching by heating, and self‐integrated optical antennae . However, these techniques are time‐consuming and require high energy or expensive equipment; furthermore, it is difficult to achieve precise regulation of pore sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, carbon materials with various structures have been developed, such as 0D carbon spheres, [17] 1D carbon nanofibers, [18] and 2D graphene. [19] Among these structures, 1D carbon is considered to be interesting because they can easily form the network-like structure with as hortened transport pathway for electron and lithiumi ons during the charge-discharge process. In addition, the introduction of defects, heteroatoms,a nd/or functional groups into the hierarchically porous1 Ds tructure can further increaset he available active sites for lithium storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%