“…Based on their characteristics, these technologies are generally classified into seven categories, all of which are discussed in more detail in the following section: binder jetting (BJ) (Do et al , 2017; Gonzalez et al , 2016); direct energy deposition (DED) (Stender et al , 2018; Javidani et al , 2017); material extrusion (ME) (Dhinakaran et al , 2020; Weng et al , 2016); material jetting (MJ)(Yap et al , 2017; Vdovin et al , 2017); powder bed fusion (PBF) (Khairallah et al , 2016; Allison et al , 2019); sheet lamination (SL) (Norfolk and Johnson, 2015; Qi Zhang, 2018; Bhatt et al , 2019); and vat polymerization (VP) (Bártolo and Gibson, 2011; Yang et al , 2019). Although some AM methods are mature, the AM industry is still thriving; many 3D printing processes are currently available, and more are emerging and developing, such as metal fused deposition modeling (metal FDM), ARBURG plastic freeforming and multi jet fusion (Ramazani and Kami, 2022; Mele et al , 2022; Avanzini et al , 2022). When selecting a 3D printing method for a specific application, decision-makers need to consider many aspects, such as mechanical, chemical and physical properties, 3D printers’ build volume, postprocessing, resolution, environmental impact, production time and cost.…”