“…For example, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) − and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) ,− spectroscopies are powerful methods that can discern short-(<5 Å) to medium-(<10 Å (NMR), <50 Å (EPR)) range structures, and thus are complementary characterization methods for materials analyses (Figure d). , The chemical and magnetic environments about the A, B′, B″, and X sites in the double perovskite considered here can be assessed through its NMR-active quadrupolar nuclei (Table S1). In practice, the 133 Cs nucleus behaves like pseudo I = 1/2 nuclear spin because of its small quadrupole moment, , and thus the local chemical structures about the A-site for halide perovskites have been extensively characterized using 133 Cs NMR spectroscopy. ,− Similarly, 23 Na NMR spectroscopy has been routinely applied to decode the chemical structures of various crystalline and amorphous solids, and the sensitivity of 35 Cl to local structure , has prompted some 35 Cl NMR investigations of perovskites, , but there is limited literature on 209 Bi NMR spectroscopy due to its large quadrupole moment and sizable quadrupolar interactions. ,, Due to the inherent insensitivity of NMR spectroscopy, some investigators have turned to high-field dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) NMR spectroscopy − to enhance the observed NMR signals through the transfer of polarization from unpaired electrons, allowing the acquisition of NMR spectra for challenging NMR nuclei. ,, For the materials considered here, the paramagnetic Mn 2+ ion provides an endogenous source of unpaired electrons to achieve direct polarization transfer to nearby nuclei in the perovskite structure and may inform on how this transition metal engages the bulk material. This novel application of endogenous DNP NMR spectroscopy allows the assessment of the influence of paramagnetic nuclei on the neighboring chemical environments, working in tandem with EPR as a direct probe on nearby nuclear spins.…”