2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.126.106602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-Insulator Transition and Emergent Gapped Phase in the Surface-Doped 2D Semiconductor 2HMoTe2

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.5.5.2 ARPES study on phase engineering in 2D materials ARPES is one of the most essential experimental techniques used to study the electronic bands of solids 408 . Demonstrating the change of phase from a metal to insulator, Han et al report the surface doped 2H-MoTe2 409 . As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Xas Study On Phase Engineering In 2d Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.5.5.2 ARPES study on phase engineering in 2D materials ARPES is one of the most essential experimental techniques used to study the electronic bands of solids 408 . Demonstrating the change of phase from a metal to insulator, Han et al report the surface doped 2H-MoTe2 409 . As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Xas Study On Phase Engineering In 2d Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 In general, heavy doping in a semiconductor leads to defect band broadening and metallic conduction. 32–34 This metallic conduction could take place due to overlapping of the wave functions of electrons in the adjacent doping sites giving rise to defect bands. Carrier conduction through such defect bands can lead to a Mott metal–insulator transition (MMIT).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to underly the formation of a pseudogap, such as polaronic interactions, , Luttinger-liquid behavior, , the Efros–Shklovskii effect, , and charge density wave (CDW) fluctuations . The physical origins of such interactions are very different even though they can give rise to similar pseudogaps; strong electron–phonon coupling and charge–lattice distortions support polaronic and CDW orders, while electron–electron interactions support Luttinger-liquid behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the change in band velocity after pump excitation (Figure F–H) is clearly not a signature of Luttinger-liquid behavior. Second, the static Coulomb repulsions among Anderson-localized carriers render the so-called Efros–Shklovski pseudogap. , However, there is not a natural way for a disorder-localized high temperature phase to give rise to a low temperature CDW phase. The well-defined CDW phase in (TaSe 4 ) 2 I at low temperature does not support a dominant role of Anderson localization in the electronic properties .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation