1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-0286(99)00032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–insulator transition in amorphous alloys

Abstract: We focus on the central problem of discriminating between metallic and insulating behaviour in amorphous alloys formed between a semiconductor and a metal. For this, the logarithmic temperature derivative of the conductivity, w = d ln σ/d ln T , has proved over recent years to be very helpful in determining the critical value x c of the metal content x for the metal-insulator transition (MIT). We show that, for various amorphous alloys, recent experimental results on w(T, x) are qualitatively inconsistent with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(171 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current estimate is ν ≈ 1. The interest in the exact value of ν arises since compensated semiconductors apparently have ν ≈ 1 as do amorphous metals [14,15,8]. On the other hand, for uncompensated semiconductors one had previously found ν ≈ 0.5 [9,8].…”
Section: Experimental Evidence In Favor Of Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current estimate is ν ≈ 1. The interest in the exact value of ν arises since compensated semiconductors apparently have ν ≈ 1 as do amorphous metals [14,15,8]. On the other hand, for uncompensated semiconductors one had previously found ν ≈ 0.5 [9,8].…”
Section: Experimental Evidence In Favor Of Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, randomness in the impurity distribution also increases favouring localization (Anderson regime). However, as experiments show beyond a certain (critical) concentration of impurities the metallic transition occurs [8,9,11,20]. It is therefore clear that because of these competing effects the transitions should occur at a higher concentration than that in a model which omits localization.…”
Section: Anderson Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more than fifty years, localization in disordered systems, in particular the corresponding metal-insulator transition (MIT), has attracted a lot of interest from both theoreticians and experimentalists. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Milestones on this way have been Anderson noting the absence of diffusion in certain lattices with disorder, 12 Mott's concept of the minimum metallic conductivity, 13 the scaling theory of localization, 14 and the renormalization group approach incorporating electron-electron interaction into localization theory. 15 Experimentally, localization in three-dimensional systems has been studied in a large number of disordered solids, such as heavily doped crystalline semiconductors (in which the disorder arises from the randomly positioned impurities), amorphous transition-metal semiconductor alloys, granular metals, and nanocrystalline substances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Experimentally, localization in three-dimensional systems has been studied in a large number of disordered solids, such as heavily doped crystalline semiconductors (in which the disorder arises from the randomly positioned impurities), amorphous transition-metal semiconductor alloys, granular metals, and nanocrystalline substances. [7][8][9][10] Many of these solids are or may become application relevant; therefore they are often considered to be among the materials. 3 In various experiments, the MIT has been triggered by diverse control parameters: composition / doping, stress, magnetic field, light, as well as structure, see, for example, Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation