2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-017-0009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal ion cycling of Cu foil for selective C–C coupling in electrochemical CO2 reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
574
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 709 publications
(601 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
21
574
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Of important note, the commercial viability of CO 2 RR to different products depends on a series of factors including not only the market demand of the product, but also the material, manufacturing, and separation costs. Although it is intuitively more desirable to control the selectivity toward higher‐valued products such as ethylene, ethanol, acetate, n ‐propanol, or even C 4 products, recent technoeconomic analysis unambiguously points out that the two‐electron electrochemical CO 2 RR to CO or formic acid is the most economically viable, whereas those C 2 –C 4 products other than propanol are not even profitable . This is understandable because the electricity cost is the major contributor to the operation cost of CO 2 electrolyzer.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Electrochemical Co2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of important note, the commercial viability of CO 2 RR to different products depends on a series of factors including not only the market demand of the product, but also the material, manufacturing, and separation costs. Although it is intuitively more desirable to control the selectivity toward higher‐valued products such as ethylene, ethanol, acetate, n ‐propanol, or even C 4 products, recent technoeconomic analysis unambiguously points out that the two‐electron electrochemical CO 2 RR to CO or formic acid is the most economically viable, whereas those C 2 –C 4 products other than propanol are not even profitable . This is understandable because the electricity cost is the major contributor to the operation cost of CO 2 electrolyzer.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Electrochemical Co2 Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harsh conditions, such as high temperature, high pressure, or highly negative electrical potentials, are generally required to convert CO 2 into other carbon compounds . On the other hand, the catalytic reduction of CO 2 via multiproton–multielectron‐coupled transfer in aqueous solutions into value‐added chemical/fuels has been regarded as a promising approach, due to its mild reaction conditions and potential product selectivity …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Among these parameters,t he catalyst structure and chemical state are of particular importance. [7,8,16,21,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] However,t he presence of (100) facets is not the only factor responsible for the superior activity and selectivity of cubeshaped Cu catalysts,w ith surface roughness,s ubsurface oxygen and Cu I species or Cu/Cu I interfaces formed and/or stabilized under reaction conditions also playing av ery important role. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Previous studies [9][10][11] on Cu single crystals have shown the improved C À Cc oupling performance of (100) facets,w hich was further confirmed by the high selectivity towards ethylene observed on cube-shaped Cu catalysts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%