Sintering - Methods and Products 2012
DOI: 10.5772/35276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Laser Sintering for Rapid Tooling in Application to Tyre Tread Pattern Mould

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) SEM analysis revealed that there is a good bonding between the particles because of reduced LSS, higher heat energy absorbed by the powder during the process which results in improved melting and higher density. The improved strength could be expected due to enhanced density of the AM parts in agreement with [22]. (8) It is observed that wear and coefficient of friction are lower at the LSS of 50 mm/s, in AM parts when compared with the parts built through PM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…(7) SEM analysis revealed that there is a good bonding between the particles because of reduced LSS, higher heat energy absorbed by the powder during the process which results in improved melting and higher density. The improved strength could be expected due to enhanced density of the AM parts in agreement with [22]. (8) It is observed that wear and coefficient of friction are lower at the LSS of 50 mm/s, in AM parts when compared with the parts built through PM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…[110,122,123] This phenomenon is greatly attributed to the faster processing, which minimizes the losses of energy, which are significant at low build rates. [64,71] However, the reported results differ: In the case of an AlSi alloy, the reproduction of the values [45,87,101,157,[160][161][162][163][164] dedicated study to this topic [121] 1.4539; 904L 99 [165] 1.2709; 18Ni Marage 300; hot work steel; EOS MS1 >99 99.99 [51,146,[166][167][168][169] 1.2343; H11 (tool steel) %100 [45] 1.2344; H13 (tool steel) >99 99.99 [119,170,171] H20 (tool steel); EOS DirectSteel >97.5 99.5 [172,173] 1.2764 (case-hardening steel) >99 [50] X110CrMoVAl 8-2 (cold work steel) %100 [174] 1.4542; 17-4PH (age-hardenable stainless steel) $99 >99.9 [55,[175][176][177] M2 HSS >90 99.8 [118,146,178] Fe-28 at% Al 99.5 [179] Fe-35 wt% Al (intermetallic) 98 [180] Fe-0.8 wt% C 93 [181] Fe-2 wt% C 92.0 [182] Fe-30Ni 98.0 [183] Fe-12Ni-4Cr 99.5 [183]...…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of AM fabricated goods, this precise correlation is not yet available, which is partially attributed to the varying irradiation parameters of the core and contour, leading to possible deviations between core and surface properties. 1.2343 50-54 [45] 1.2344 706-894 PT ¼ NP-400 C [119] H20 34 319 [173] X110CrMoVAl 8-2 493 [174] M2 HSS 64; 57 remelting; single irradiation [118,146] 650-900 [178,224] Fe-12Ni-4Cr 450 320-420 [183,225] Fe85Cr4Mo8V2C1 883-900 energy density ¼ 89, 130 J mm À3 [174] Fe-12Ni-4Cr HIP 475-500 100 MPa, 2 h, 1050 C [225] Table 11. [91] In addition, it was documented that inhomogeneities along samples, for example, different stages of precipitation hardening, can be detected via hardness measurements.…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a desirable set of performance characteristics, H13/DIN 1.2344 tool steel is often used in traditionally manufactured injection mould tools. However, there has been a comparatively limited focus in the literature on the application of H13 tool steel in SLM manufacture of injection moulds (Armillotta et al , 2013; Lee et al , 2009; Păcurar, Păcurar, & Bâlc, 2013), with most work focused on stainless (Milovanovic et al , 2012; Sachs et al , 1997, 2000; Thomas, 2010; Xu et al , 2001) or maraging steels (Casavola et al , 2008, 2009; EOS GmbH, 2012; Mayer, 2012). Stainless steels offer corrosion resistance; however, they are typically of lower hardness than tool steels such as H13, resulting in reduced wear performance (ASM, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%