2023
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c03376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–Ligand Proton Tautomerism, Electron Transfer, and C(sp3)–H Activation by a 4-Pyridinyl-Pincer Iridium Hydride Complex

Tariq M. Bhatti,
Akshai Kumar,
Ashish Parihar
et al.

Abstract: The para-N-pyridyl-based PCP pincer proligand 3,5-bis(di-tertbutylphosphinomethyl)-2,6-dimethylpyridine (pN-tBu PCP-H) was synthesized and metalated to give the iridium complex (pN-tBu PCP)IrHCl (2-H). In marked contrast with its phenyl-based congeners, e.g., ( tBu PCP)IrHCl and derivatives, 2-H is highly air-sensitive and reacts with oxidants such as ferrocenium, trityl cation, and benzoquinone. These oxidations ultimately lead to intramolecular activation of a phosphino-t-butyl C(sp 3 )−H bond and cyclometal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ( i Pr PCP)­Ir­(I) fragment has been found in many instances to be catalytically more active than the iconic ( t Bu PCP)­Ir­(I) analogue, , presumably due to lesser crowding at the iridium center. In the case of Ir­(III) complexes, with the metal center bearing ancillary anionic ligands in addition to the pincer, we would expect that the less sterically demanding i Pr PCP ligand would confer an even greater advantage with respect to intermolecular reactivity . Accordingly, we chose to investigate ( i Pr PCP)­Ir­(III) complexes, and we began our study with the synthesis of ( i Pr PCP)­IrHCl ( 1-HCl ; 1 = ( i Pr PCP)­Ir).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ( i Pr PCP)­Ir­(I) fragment has been found in many instances to be catalytically more active than the iconic ( t Bu PCP)­Ir­(I) analogue, , presumably due to lesser crowding at the iridium center. In the case of Ir­(III) complexes, with the metal center bearing ancillary anionic ligands in addition to the pincer, we would expect that the less sterically demanding i Pr PCP ligand would confer an even greater advantage with respect to intermolecular reactivity . Accordingly, we chose to investigate ( i Pr PCP)­Ir­(III) complexes, and we began our study with the synthesis of ( i Pr PCP)­IrHCl ( 1-HCl ; 1 = ( i Pr PCP)­Ir).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 12/17/23 confer an even greater advantage with respect to intermolecular reactivity. 59 Accordingly, we began our study with the synthesis of ( iPr PCP)IrHCl 57 (1-HCl; 1 = ( iPr PCP)Ir). Although this complex is well known, previously reported synthetic routes in our experience lead to mixtures of 1-HCl and 1-HBr, where the bromide is derived from 1,3-bis(bromomethyl)benzene starting material 58 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of C–N bonds holds paramount significance in the synthesis of medicines, pharmaceutical molecules, and organic group functionalization. In this context, the C–H functionalization approach offers a sustainable and atom-economical route for the synthesis of nitrogen-containing compounds. Although direct functionalization of C–H bonds to create C–N bonds has been achieved, often, using expensive transition metal complexes, , C­(sp 3 )–H functionalization presents a notable challenge due to the low polarity and poor reactivity of these bonds. As a result, reports on the inter- and intramolecular functionalization of unactivated C–H bonds are relatively scarce …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%