1971
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/4/16/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-nonmetal transition in magnetic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this definition we introduce the so-called anomalous (off-diagonal) GFs which fix the relevant vacuum and select the proper symmetry broken solutions. In fact, this approximation has been investigated earlier by Kishore and Joshi [50]. They clearly pointed out that they assumed that the system is magnetized in the x direction instead of the conventional z axis.…”
Section: Symmetry Broken Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With this definition we introduce the so-called anomalous (off-diagonal) GFs which fix the relevant vacuum and select the proper symmetry broken solutions. In fact, this approximation has been investigated earlier by Kishore and Joshi [50]. They clearly pointed out that they assumed that the system is magnetized in the x direction instead of the conventional z axis.…”
Section: Symmetry Broken Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, the calculation of C(T ) must be performed keeping n constant in the T −µ plane [11]. The energy per atom is E = H N (N being the number of sites of the system) and can be written as [12]:…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and G = 4G 1 N q ǫ( k − q)F σ ( q), where ǫ( k − q) = i=0 j 0 t 0 j e i( k− q)• R j and F σ ( q) is given in terms of S j • S i and the Fourier transform of n j0σ and m jσ defined as n 0 jσ = d † 0σ d jσ = 1 N k F ω G (11) kσ e i k• R j and m jσ = d † 0σ n j−σ d jσ = 1 N k F ω G (12) kσ e i k• R j , where F ω Γ(ω) ≡…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hamiltonian for the model is given by By the method of the double-time temperature dependent Green function (5) we find (in approximations corresponding to the Hartree-Fock one for itinerant electrons (6) and the molecular field one for localized spins) the density of states and selfconsistent equations for the local magnetizations of both subsystems. W e alm study the ground state stability of the magnetic phases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we con- /(a -U)). In this case the system, at low temperatures, is a ferromagnetic = 1 / 2 , x F F 1 (for a square density of states (6), 0…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%