Lithium-Sulfur Batteries 2022
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-91934-0.00001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–organic framework based cathode materials in lithium–sulfur batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 119 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there have already been various publications on carbon, metal oxide, and MOF composite NFs, there are many materials within those broad categories that have only sparsely or have yet to be applied to NF separators. For example, ZIF-8 and ZIF-67 are commonly tested MOFs as discussed in Section 5.3 , but there are many other MOFs, such as MOF-808 [ 155 ], MIL-100 [ 156 ], and UiO 66 [ 157 ], that have not been applied to NF separators. Similarly, there are more metal oxides than those examined in Section 5.2 and carbon nanomaterials examined in Section 5.2 that may suppress the shuttle effect and improve LSB performance.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have already been various publications on carbon, metal oxide, and MOF composite NFs, there are many materials within those broad categories that have only sparsely or have yet to be applied to NF separators. For example, ZIF-8 and ZIF-67 are commonly tested MOFs as discussed in Section 5.3 , but there are many other MOFs, such as MOF-808 [ 155 ], MIL-100 [ 156 ], and UiO 66 [ 157 ], that have not been applied to NF separators. Similarly, there are more metal oxides than those examined in Section 5.2 and carbon nanomaterials examined in Section 5.2 that may suppress the shuttle effect and improve LSB performance.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%