2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–organic framework-mediated strategy for enhanced methane production on copper nanoparticles in electrochemical CO2 reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 3 b, only CH 4 , CO, C 2 H 4 , and H 2 were detected by GC and no liquid product was found in 1 H NMR. Interestingly, high selectivity of 73 % at −1.4 V towards CH 4 was achieved for Cu 2 O@CuHHTP (Figure 3 b), which is one of the several highly selective Cu‐based catalysts (Supporting Information, Table S1) [20, 22, 36–46] . In contrast, the pristine CuHHTP shows poor CH 4 selectivity and affords a large amount of H 2 (Supporting Information, Figure S10), strongly indicating that the CO 2 RR activities were originated from Cu 2 O quantum dots but not CuHHTP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 b, only CH 4 , CO, C 2 H 4 , and H 2 were detected by GC and no liquid product was found in 1 H NMR. Interestingly, high selectivity of 73 % at −1.4 V towards CH 4 was achieved for Cu 2 O@CuHHTP (Figure 3 b), which is one of the several highly selective Cu‐based catalysts (Supporting Information, Table S1) [20, 22, 36–46] . In contrast, the pristine CuHHTP shows poor CH 4 selectivity and affords a large amount of H 2 (Supporting Information, Figure S10), strongly indicating that the CO 2 RR activities were originated from Cu 2 O quantum dots but not CuHHTP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the reduction of Cu centers to Cu 2 O releases abundant uncoordinated hydroxyl groups nearby active sites, which can form hydrogen bonds with intermediates and lower the energy barrier towards the formation of CH 4 . As a result, the obtained Cu 2 O@CuHHTP exhibited outstanding CO 2 RR performance with 73 % Faradaic efficiency of the conversion from CO 2 to CH 4 , outperforming most electrocatalysts (especially MOF‐based catalysts) in reported works (Supporting Information, Table S1) [19, 20, 22, 36–46] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To achieve high selectivity of CH 4 with large current density in CO 2 RR, several factors should be considered. Firstly, Cu‐based catalysts are usually composed of multiple species such as Cu, Cu 2 O, CuO, and Cu(OH) 2 , which could produce different types of products and lead to low selectivity for CH 4 [21, 22] . So, constructing copper‐based electrocatalyst with single type of active site is quite important to achieve high selectivity of CH 4 [23, 24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al. employed an electrochemical reduction strategy for the decomposition of MOFs, thereby obtaining an efficient electrocatalyst for the synthesis of CH 4 . They chose copper‐based MOF‐74 as the precursor, which was electrochemically reduced into copper nanoparticles (NPs).…”
Section: Mof‐related Catalysts For Co2ermentioning
confidence: 99%