2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-00635-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–organic frameworks embedded in a liposome facilitate overall photocatalytic water splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
163
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the most active reported MOF‐based photocatalysts, one should mention a complex Zn‐porphyrin system that uses [Ru(2,2‐pipyridine) 3 ] 2+ centers as photosensitizers and Ir–bipyridine catalytic centers, encapsulated within the hydrophilic interior of a liposome and in the presence of two redox relays: Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ ions (in the aqueous phase) and tetrachlorobenzoquinone (TCBQ)/tetrachlorobenzohydrosemiquinone (TCBQH) pair (in the organic phase), exhibiting a production of 836 µmol g −1 in 72 h under LED light irradiation. [ 46 ] In comparison with this complex multicomponent system, IEF‐11 exhibits higher performance in terms of production (672 µmol g −1 in 22 h vs 836 µmol g −1 in 72 h from the liposome system) and high photocatalytic stability upon reuse (up to 10 d vs unreported reuses). In addition, IEF‐11 is a much simpler photocatalytic system constituted by a single material with lower cost (derived from the absence of expensive noble metals as Ru or Ir that are present in the liposome system).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most active reported MOF‐based photocatalysts, one should mention a complex Zn‐porphyrin system that uses [Ru(2,2‐pipyridine) 3 ] 2+ centers as photosensitizers and Ir–bipyridine catalytic centers, encapsulated within the hydrophilic interior of a liposome and in the presence of two redox relays: Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ ions (in the aqueous phase) and tetrachlorobenzoquinone (TCBQ)/tetrachlorobenzohydrosemiquinone (TCBQH) pair (in the organic phase), exhibiting a production of 836 µmol g −1 in 72 h under LED light irradiation. [ 46 ] In comparison with this complex multicomponent system, IEF‐11 exhibits higher performance in terms of production (672 µmol g −1 in 22 h vs 836 µmol g −1 in 72 h from the liposome system) and high photocatalytic stability upon reuse (up to 10 d vs unreported reuses). In addition, IEF‐11 is a much simpler photocatalytic system constituted by a single material with lower cost (derived from the absence of expensive noble metals as Ru or Ir that are present in the liposome system).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thec erium salt, the free ligand NAD + and their physical mixture were applied in this model experiment, resulting in negative activity under identical conditions (Table 1, entries 4-6), verifying the high photocatalytic activity of Ce-NAD + for the arylation of inert C(sp 3 )ÀHbonds and that the conjunction of NAD + fragments and Ce-OEt moieties was conducive to promoting the PET and LMCT for multiphoton excitation activation of inert C(sp 3 ) À Hbonds. [32] Moreover,the addition of the alkalies into the aforementioned photocatalytic reaction systems did not result in as ignificant enhancement on the yields (Table 1, entries 7a nd 8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hence, numerous researchers devoted themselves to the highly efficient noble metal‐free catalysts for overall water splitting, particularly, MOFs and their composites as efficient bifunctional photocatalysts for H 2 and O 2 evolution. [ 300–304 ]…”
Section: The Photocatalysis Applications Of the Mofs‐based Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%