2022
DOI: 10.34133/2022/9837109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-Organic Frameworks Offering Tunable Binary Active Sites toward Highly Efficient Urea Oxidation Electrolysis

Abstract: Electrocatalytic urea oxidation reaction (UOR) is regarded as an effective yet challenging approach for the degradation of urea in wastewater into harmless N2 and CO2. To overcome the sluggish kinetics, catalytically active sites should be rationally designed to maneuver the multiple key steps of intermediate adsorption and desorption. Herein, we demonstrate that metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can provide an ideal platform for tailoring binary active sites to facilitate the rate-determining steps, achieving r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which are made up of well-dispersed metal nodes and organic ligands, are a class of crystalline porous materials. , As their skeleton can serve as superior electron pathways and the ordered porous architecture facilitates ultrafast transport of reactants, products, and electrolytes, MOFs are regarded as star catalysts for various applications, including electrochemical energy storage and conversion . More importantly, the catalytic performance of MOFs can be optimized easily by tuning their topological structures and metal nodes. , Compared with conventional inorganic materials, MOFs with a tunable homogeneous microenvironment at the molecular level possess multiple advantages for practical catalysis. , An attractive option to develop efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts toward the HER and HzOR is to introduce noble-metal SA catalytic sites into a Ni-based MOF matrix. In most reported cases, however, MOFs were used as precursors/templates and calcined into porous carbon structures to support SA catalysts. , By doing so, the original structures of MOFs were destroyed, thereby losing the advantages mentioned above for MOFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which are made up of well-dispersed metal nodes and organic ligands, are a class of crystalline porous materials. , As their skeleton can serve as superior electron pathways and the ordered porous architecture facilitates ultrafast transport of reactants, products, and electrolytes, MOFs are regarded as star catalysts for various applications, including electrochemical energy storage and conversion . More importantly, the catalytic performance of MOFs can be optimized easily by tuning their topological structures and metal nodes. , Compared with conventional inorganic materials, MOFs with a tunable homogeneous microenvironment at the molecular level possess multiple advantages for practical catalysis. , An attractive option to develop efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts toward the HER and HzOR is to introduce noble-metal SA catalytic sites into a Ni-based MOF matrix. In most reported cases, however, MOFs were used as precursors/templates and calcined into porous carbon structures to support SA catalysts. , By doing so, the original structures of MOFs were destroyed, thereby losing the advantages mentioned above for MOFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Compared with conventional inorganic materials, MOFs with a tunable homogeneous microenvironment at the molecular level possess multiple advantages for practical catalysis. 31,32 An attractive option to develop efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts toward the HER and HzOR is to introduce noble-metal SA catalytic sites into a Ni-based MOF matrix. In most reported cases, however, MOFs were used as precursors/templates and calcined into porous carbon structures to support SA catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the high-resolution C 1s spectra of the three samples (Figures S6b, S7b, and S8b) also showed an extra C–N peak. In the meantime, the high-resolution O 1s spectra of the three samples (Figures S6d, S7d, and Figure S8d) also showed a second peak with a higher binding energy, which can be attributed to the adsorbed water. The higher the reaction temperature of the sample, the stronger the intensity of this peak. It is because the increase of the specific surface areas and pores allows more water molecules to enter the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“… 13 The electrochemical stability of MOF 1 is compared to that of other Ni-based electrocatalysts from the literature. The stability of MOFs such as Ni-MOF-0.5, 42 2D Ni-MOF, 43 Ni-MOF-100, 56 NiO@Ni-MOF, 48 NiMn 0.14 -BDC MOF, 57 and 3% CeO 2 /Ni-MOF has been documented. 58 LSV was undertaken after a long-term stability test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%