2009
DOI: 10.1039/b902988e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal–organic macrocycles, metal–organic polyhedra and metal–organic frameworks

Abstract: Metal-organic macrocycles (MOMs), metal-organic polyhedra (MOPs) and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are metal-organic systems (MOSs) developed from appropriately designed ligands and selected metal ions. Metalladiazamacrocycles, a class of MOMs, are finite 2D MOSs formed from tricationic hexacoordinate metal ions and ditopic bridging ligands, N-acylsalicylhydrazide, containing diaza residues, where the size and shape of the systems have been modulated by controlling the steric repulsions between the ligands. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metal-ligand bond coordination is a cornerstone of various designing strategies such as directional bonding, symmetry interactions, molecular paneling, weak linking, and dimetallic building blocks. These strategies are predominantly used by Atwood [7], Cotton [8,9], Fujita [10][11][12], Lindoy [13][14][15][16], Mirkin [17][18][19], Nitschke [20][21][22], Raymond [23][24][25][26], Stang [27][28][29][30][31], Saalfrank [32,33], Ward [34,35], Yaghi [36][37][38], Zhou [39][40][41], and others [42][43][44][45] in designing 2D and 3D supramolecular architectures. The directional bonding approach relies on the angular orientation (0 to 180°) of binding sites and appropriate stoichiometric ratio of the precursor units.…”
Section: Design Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metal-ligand bond coordination is a cornerstone of various designing strategies such as directional bonding, symmetry interactions, molecular paneling, weak linking, and dimetallic building blocks. These strategies are predominantly used by Atwood [7], Cotton [8,9], Fujita [10][11][12], Lindoy [13][14][15][16], Mirkin [17][18][19], Nitschke [20][21][22], Raymond [23][24][25][26], Stang [27][28][29][30][31], Saalfrank [32,33], Ward [34,35], Yaghi [36][37][38], Zhou [39][40][41], and others [42][43][44][45] in designing 2D and 3D supramolecular architectures. The directional bonding approach relies on the angular orientation (0 to 180°) of binding sites and appropriate stoichiometric ratio of the precursor units.…”
Section: Design Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it was expected by introducing a ferrocene group into coordination macrocyclic systems not only incorporates a redox-active group but also leads to interesting assembled structures due to the conformational flexibility of the ferrocene moiety such as sinperiplanar, synclinal (staggered), synclinal (eclipsed) and so on [20]. Such factors could control the size of the MOMs, where the number of components is usually controlled by the bending torsion angle of ferrocenyl moieties [16]. Finally, it is well-known that the incorporation of a secondary ligand capable to coordinate in a chelate mode is also required; such condition provides a way to the passivation of metal sites by N donors, avoiding spatial propagation of the resulting metal-organic array [21,[23][24][25][26] prepared and most of them have shown a polymeric crystal structure [20][21][22][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The size of the MOMs can be modulated by length control of the ditopic exo-bidentate ligands [16][17][18][19]. On the other hand, the connectivity and geometrical environment of those metal centers which have a large coordination number are usually controlled by the number and stereochemistry of stable ligands bonded to the metal centers [16]. From the viewpoint of designing MOMs may be interesting incorporate functional ligands, which can combine flexibility with coordinating groups such as carboxylate group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations