1982
DOI: 10.1021/j100212a042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal oxide-support interactions in silica-supported iron oxide catalysts probed by nitric oxide adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
8
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46,47,54] The lower the coordination, the higher the number of coordinative positions occupied by adsorbed NO. Surface Fe 2 + sites yielding tri-, di-and mononitrosyls will hereafter be referred to as Fe Figure 8A).…”
Section: Wwwchemeurjorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[46,47,54] The lower the coordination, the higher the number of coordinative positions occupied by adsorbed NO. Surface Fe 2 + sites yielding tri-, di-and mononitrosyls will hereafter be referred to as Fe Figure 8A).…”
Section: Wwwchemeurjorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44] The nature and abundance of the surface active sites have been evaluated by means of the adsorption of nitric oxide as a probe molecule, commonly employed on iron centres of various materials. [45][46][47] The fibre surface was previously deprived of the adsorbed molecules by outgassing under vacuum. The coordinative unsaturations created in such a way were filled by NO molecules, the vibrational features of which depend on the characteristics of the related surface centre.…”
Section: Modification Induced In Surface Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the common oxidic supports silica and alumina it is difficult to prevent reaction of the iron(II), which is initially produced during reduction, with the support to iron(II) silicate or iron(II) aluminate. As both iron(II) silicate and iron(II) aluminate are very difficult to reduce [6][7][8][9][10][11], silica and alumina are not very suitable as support for iron-based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Zirconia does not form bulk iron(II) zirconate, although the interaction with iron oxide is sufficient [12][13][14][15][16] to anchor supported metallic iron particles through an intermediate very thin iron oxide layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For iron catalysts supported on Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 the formation of ferrous aluminates and silicates has been reported [18,[20][21][22][23][24]. Wielers et al [21] observed the formation of a silicate layer during reduction of trivalent iron indicating that, as soon as divalent iron is formed, iron migrates into the support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Mössbauer measurements reveal the presence of high spin Fe 2+ species with quadrupole splittings at room temperature (2.7-1.7 mm/s) significantly higher than for bulk FeO (about 0.55 mm/s). These results point to the formation of ferrous species due to an intimate interaction with the support [9][10][11][13][14][15]18,[20][21][22][23][24]. One of the two iron(II) species is identified as a Fe 2+ which upon formation immediately migrates into the zirconia support to form a mixed oxide.…”
Section: Reduction and Reduction Model Of Fe/zromentioning
confidence: 99%