2018
DOI: 10.1177/0363546518764916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Resurfacing Inlay Implant for Osteochondral Talar Defects After Failed Previous Surgery: A Midterm Prospective Follow-up Study

Abstract: This study shows that the metal implant is an effective technique when assessed at midterm follow-up for OCDs of the medial talar dome after failed previous surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 2 studies identified with a total of 49 patients. 19,96 An overview of the study characteristics, patient characteristics, and outcomes within this group is shown in Table 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 2 studies identified with a total of 49 patients. 19,96 An overview of the study characteristics, patient characteristics, and outcomes within this group is shown in Table 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with great interest the article “Metal Resurfacing Inlay Implant for Osteochondral Talar Defects After Failed Previous Surgery: A Midterm Prospective Follow-up Study” by Vuurberg et al 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, we have observed a "back to the future" due to the use of a surgical strategy that involves focal talus resurfacing metal implants (2). The concept of resurfacing was born in the 1960s with Sir John Charnley, while the first reference as regards foot and ankle is dated 1981 with Daniels et al (3,4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal resurfacing has found much of its clinical use in revision surgery: recently Vuurberg et al (2) analyzed 38 patients who underwent metal resurfacing after previous failed OLTs surgery. Mean age at surgery was 39 years and patients were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 5.1 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation