1977
DOI: 10.3109/17453677708988763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal Sensitivity in Patients Treated for Tibial Fractures with Plates of Stainless Steel

Abstract: In three patients a local dermatitis developed 3-3 1/2 months after tibial osteosynthesis with plates and screws of stainless steel 316 L (AO). Two of the patients had a positive patch test for chromium (and cobalt) and one for nickel. Infection was not indicated and it is suggested that the dermatitis was caused by a metallic sensitivity. The skin affection disappeared after removal of the metal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All the other samples, independent of the producer, were always found to contain a consistently low percentage of additions, such as nickel, following their further processing into rods of different sizes [diameters between 6 and 60 mm were analyzed]. Numerous publications deal with hypersensitivity reactions to osteosynthesis materials used in the treatment of fractures, the majority of these materials being stainless steel implants [7,19,32]. An immunological response to metals [partly as an exaggerated allergic reaction] is discussed to be the cause of impaired wound healing or the delayed healing of fractures [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the other samples, independent of the producer, were always found to contain a consistently low percentage of additions, such as nickel, following their further processing into rods of different sizes [diameters between 6 and 60 mm were analyzed]. Numerous publications deal with hypersensitivity reactions to osteosynthesis materials used in the treatment of fractures, the majority of these materials being stainless steel implants [7,19,32]. An immunological response to metals [partly as an exaggerated allergic reaction] is discussed to be the cause of impaired wound healing or the delayed healing of fractures [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Биомеханически и анатомически обоснованные конструкции с условиями минимальной инва зивности и стабильности фиксации ежедневно пополняют арсенал врача. Однако аллергическая реакция на металл становится причиной неудачи применения даже самого обоснованного имплан тата [8,9]. Одним из направлений профилакти УДК 616.428-053: 616-089.84-06 Морфофункциональное состояние регионарных лиМфатических узлов в условиях интраМедуллярного остеосинтеза фиксатораМи с покрытиеМ на основе сверхтвердых соединений И.Ф.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The association between metal implants and metal sensitivity is well documented, although, unfortunately, reactions are relatively unpredictable, poorly understood, and highly debated [6][7][8]. Dermal hypersensitivity to metal is common and can affect up to 15% of the population [9].…”
Section: The Rising Potential Impact Of Metal Hypersensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%