2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8cc08517j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal support effects in electrocatalysis at hexagonal boron nitride

Abstract: The metal support of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets has a significant effect on the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction, as visualized by scanning electrochemical cell microscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The invention of the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) had a significant impact on the study of electrochemical interfaces and further led to the development of electrochemically‐based scanned probe microscopes (SPMs) . Scanning electrochemical probe microscopes (SEPMs), which use a small electrode or electrochemical half‐cell as a probe (tip), have attracted considerable attention as a means of mapping electrochemical activity and chemical fluxes at the microscale and nanoscale for a wide range of substrates and materials . While the spatiotemporal resolution of SEPM has improved over the years, the ultimate lateral resolution of these methods is generally limited by either diffusion of the measured species to the electrode (diffusional blur) and/or the physical size of the tip used…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The invention of the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) had a significant impact on the study of electrochemical interfaces and further led to the development of electrochemically‐based scanned probe microscopes (SPMs) . Scanning electrochemical probe microscopes (SEPMs), which use a small electrode or electrochemical half‐cell as a probe (tip), have attracted considerable attention as a means of mapping electrochemical activity and chemical fluxes at the microscale and nanoscale for a wide range of substrates and materials . While the spatiotemporal resolution of SEPM has improved over the years, the ultimate lateral resolution of these methods is generally limited by either diffusion of the measured species to the electrode (diffusional blur) and/or the physical size of the tip used…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Scanning electrochemical probe microscopes (SEPMs), which use a small electrode or electrochemical half-cell as a probe (tip), have attracted considerable attention as a means of mapping electrochemical activity and chemical fluxes at the microscale and nanoscale for a wide range of substrates and materials. [3][4][5][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] While the spatiotemporal resolution of SEPM has improved over the years, the ultimate lateral resolution of these methods is generally limited by either diffusion of the measured species to the electrode (diffusional blur) and/or the physical size of the tip used. [17] A well-known problem of some SEPMs, like scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM), is that the tip response depends on both surface activity and tip-substrate distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Liu et al studied h-BN supported on Au and Cu (h-BN/Au and h-BN/Cu) by scanning electrochemical droplet cell technique. Obtained results revealed improvement but still a very poor activity of h-BN on Cu and moderate activity of h-BN/Au (two orders of magnitude higher than for h-BN/Cu), which revealed a significant influence of the metallic surface [72].…”
Section: Supported Metallic Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, Liu et al studied h-BN supported on Au and Cu (h-BN/Au and h-BN/Cu) by scanning electrochemical droplet cell technique. Obtained results revealed improved, but yet a very poor activity of h-BN on Cu, and moderate activity of h-BN/Au (two orders of magnitude higher than for h-BN/Cu), which revealed a significant influence of the metallic surface [59].…”
Section: Supported Metallic Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 95%