2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal-support interaction boosted electrocatalysis of ultrasmall iridium nanoparticles supported on nitrogen doped graphene for highly efficient water electrolysis in acidic and alkaline media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
133
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ever since the first report of strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) in heterogeneous catalysis by Tauster et al. in 1978, [ 7 ] numerous studies have been carried out to gain a deeper understanding of this effect, covering versatile fields including hydrogen production, [ 8–10 ] oxygen evolution, [ 11 ] oxygen reduction, [ 12 ] and carbon monoxide oxidation. [ 13–15 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since the first report of strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) in heterogeneous catalysis by Tauster et al. in 1978, [ 7 ] numerous studies have been carried out to gain a deeper understanding of this effect, covering versatile fields including hydrogen production, [ 8–10 ] oxygen evolution, [ 11 ] oxygen reduction, [ 12 ] and carbon monoxide oxidation. [ 13–15 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,5,6] Pt-and Ir/Ru-based noble metals are the best catalysts for HER and OER, respectively. [7][8][9] Unfortunately, their large-scale applications are hampered by their high cost and scarcity. As a consequence, it is extremely necessary to develop highly active while sustainable electrocatalysts for HER and OER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if Ru content in the composites is taken into account, deterioration of catalytic performance in the case of impregnated Ru@CF seems plausible, particularly because overpotential at 1 A mg −1 is higher for impregnated Ru@fCF, compared to the impregnated Ru@pCP, while the former has significantly lower stability. Benefits of functionalization of carbon-based supports were demonstrated in the case of ultrasmall iridium nanoparticles supported on N-doped graphene, reported by Wu et al [57]. They compared the electrocatalytic performance of Ir nanoparticles (1.81 ± 0.55 nm) supported on graphene (obtained by hydrothermal treatment, followed by annealing at 700 • C -Ir@G-750), Ir nanoparticles (2.18 ± 0.92 nm) supported on N-doped graphene (prepared by annealing polydopamine modified graphene oxide with Ir 3+ at 750 • C -Ir@N-G-750 • C), and commercial Ir/C and Pt/C.…”
Section: Supported Metallic Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 92%