2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal uptake of two ecophysiologically different earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Aporrectodea caliginosa) exposed to ultramafic soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a given concentration when the metal uptake by an individual worm reaches a distinct threshold level, the worms actively eliminate the excess in their cast. This implies that the elimination process is based on the transport of Cd into internal storage compartments [ 44 ]. BCF for both worm species gradually decreased with the increase of Cd concentration in soil ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a given concentration when the metal uptake by an individual worm reaches a distinct threshold level, the worms actively eliminate the excess in their cast. This implies that the elimination process is based on the transport of Cd into internal storage compartments [ 44 ]. BCF for both worm species gradually decreased with the increase of Cd concentration in soil ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the observation that, at low Cd concentration, earthworms absorb and accumulate Cd in their tissues. In contrast, at higher concentrations, earthworms could absorb Cd but not to accumulate it, and thus, worms eliminate Cd into their cast [ 44 ]. When the bulk soils are taken up by worms, it passes through their guts; enzyme, surfactant and the mucus secreted into the content changes the metal form [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, earthworms developed a strategy by which, when the uptake chemical reaches a certain concentration level, the worms actively could eliminate the excess of pollutant in their corresponding cast [ 35 ]. This implies an uptake/elimination process based on the transport of metals into internal storage compartments and its excretion thereafter [ 51 ]. BAF for both worm species gradually decreased with the increase of Cd concentration in soil ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennette et al, 2002;Nahmani et al, 2007;Suthar et al, 2008;Goix et al, 2015). Furthermore, chemical analysis of earthworms may provide an indication of bioavailable amounts of heavy metals (Maleri et al, 2008;Ruiz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the various factors influencing element availability in soil, more specific available pools may be defined (Harmsen, 2007;Peijnenburg et al, 2007;Maleri et al, 2008;Alvarenga et al, 2012): 1) the "effective available" pool consisting of water-soluble and extractable fractions, which are the most mobile and very active pool of a chemical element, mainly regulated by rapid reactions in soil such as water solubilization, ionic exchange and acid dissolution; 2) the "potentially available" pool, consisting of reducible and oxidable fractions, namely the leachable and partly active pool mainly mobilizable by redox reactions; 3) the "bioaccessible" pool, the amount of a chemical element that can be released through digestion by water and ingested soil; this is the fraction most available for intestinal uptake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%