1981
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716400009772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metalinguistic awareness in young deaf children: A preliminary study

Abstract: This study explores the metalinguistic abilities of prelingually deaf children aged 4-7, who are users of Signed English, with regard to their explicit segmentation of Signed English sentences into words. Subjects exhibited varying metalinguistic abilities that generally increased with age and that were similar to the developmental pattern found in hearing populations. Based upon performance with respect to four factors (i.e., explicit segmentation, omissions of function words, content words, and inflectional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In part, this is due to differences in ages or training of subjects (Cooper, 1967;Quigley & King, 1980). But it also results from limitations in either the range of grammatical features these studies examined or their procedures for eliciting responses (Crandall, 1978;Zorfass, 1981), which may have required only judgments of correctness (Raffin et al, 1978). However, the individual elements of deaf subjects' ICP responses (e.g., the noun plurals of the 3rd Person Present Indicative contrasts) do seem to indicate greater facility with -ing than -ed and earlier control of plural -s than indicative -s inflections.…”
Section: Subtest Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In part, this is due to differences in ages or training of subjects (Cooper, 1967;Quigley & King, 1980). But it also results from limitations in either the range of grammatical features these studies examined or their procedures for eliciting responses (Crandall, 1978;Zorfass, 1981), which may have required only judgments of correctness (Raffin et al, 1978). However, the individual elements of deaf subjects' ICP responses (e.g., the noun plurals of the 3rd Person Present Indicative contrasts) do seem to indicate greater facility with -ing than -ed and earlier control of plural -s than indicative -s inflections.…”
Section: Subtest Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But they did discover a positive relationship between performance and length of time in an MCE program which the Crandall (1978) study did not examine with the younger deaf subjects. Zorfass (1981) evaluated metalinguistic abilities of 4-to 7-year-olds with a manipulative imitation task. The analyses that focused on omission of MCE function words and inflectional endings showed a significant positive correlation of age with performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there has been little metalinguistic research with hearing-impaired children, and the principal focus of existing studies has been on phonological segmentation skills. This research has revealed hearing-impaired children's ability to segment their fingerspelled lexicons (Hirsh-Pasek, 1987), as well as age-related increases in the segmentation of Signed English sentences into words (Zorfass, 1981). Thus, we know that young hearingimpaired children are aware of words as units of language, at the very least.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%