1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70321-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallic self-expanding stent application in the upper gastrointestinal tract: caveats and concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1, 2), the 12-french compression and delivery system proved far from Expandable metallic prostheses were initially placed ideal [5]. Moreover, the relatively large space between the metal struts allowed early ingrowth and recurrence of transhepatically for malignant biliary strictures by interventional radiologists [1].…”
Section: Stenoses Expandable Gastrointestinal Prostheses Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2), the 12-french compression and delivery system proved far from Expandable metallic prostheses were initially placed ideal [5]. Moreover, the relatively large space between the metal struts allowed early ingrowth and recurrence of transhepatically for malignant biliary strictures by interventional radiologists [1].…”
Section: Stenoses Expandable Gastrointestinal Prostheses Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, laser therapy, and stent insertion have been reported to relieve symptoms. Recently, metallic stents have become popular in the palliative treatment of patients with dysphagia caused by oesophageal carcinoma (Song et al, 1991;Bethge et al, 1992;Fleischer et al, 1992;Kozarek et al, 1992;Schaer et al, 1992;Knyrim et al, 1993;May et al, 1995;Wengrower et al, 1998). These stents can be inserted on an outpatient basis and provide rapid relief of symptoms of dysphagia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, surgical bypass surgery was performed in these patients [5,6]. However, since Kozarek et al reported the usefulness of duodenal stenting in 1922, EDuS has generally been conducted to alleviate the symptoms of duodenal stenosis associated with malignant diseases [11]. Studies comparing endoscopic stenting and surgical bypass have reported that although there were no obvious differences in efficacy and overall survival, the time until the resumption of oral ingestion was earlier and the duration of hospitalization was shorter in patients who underwent endoscopic stenting [7,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%