“…Inspired by metalloproteases that contain Lewis acid metals in their active sites, various metals were combined with suitable organic ligands to form chelating complexes with a high stability and versatile reactivity that can be used for protein hydrolysis among many other biomolecular transformations. , In the past decade, our group has developed polyoxometalates (POMs) as inorganic ligands for metal cations, where the molecular recognition ability of the POM scaffolds toward protein surfaces was combined with hydrolytically active Lewis acid metal cations (Ce(IV), Zr(IV), or Hf(IV)) to catalyze peptide bond hydrolysis. − Despite this promising proof of concept, the relatively low reactivity of classical transition metal complexes, prompted the development of nanozymes, i.e., nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-like properties. − The rapid evolution and growing understanding of nanomaterials allow for the engineering of active centers that mimic those of natural enzymes, resulting in nanomaterials that could address current limitations of natural enzymes. , Despite the remarkable advances in the field, most nanozymes have been designed to exhibit redox activity, mimicking the oxidase/peroxidase family of enzymes. − Nanozymes that mimic other types of enzymes, such as proteases, have seen substantially less development in comparison. − In this regard, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently emerged as highly reactive and recyclable catalysts for protein hydrolysis. − In particular, MOFs based on Zr(IV) and Hf(IV) metal-oxo clusters (MOCs) have been used as catalysts for an array of different biomolecular transformations, including peptide bond hydrolysis, where theoretical studies suggested that MOCs act as the catalytically active sites. ,,, …”