2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.1621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metalloproteinases at the surface of small extrcellular vesicles in advanced ovarian cancer: Relationships with ascites volume and peritoneal canceromatosis index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…MMP9+/MMP2+/ EMMPRIN+ subpopulation of CD9-positive blood plasma exosomes reduced the cancer risk in CPPs. Similar data were obtained for ovarian cancer (Yunusova et al, 2019). Subpopulation of MMP9+/MMP2+/EMMPRIN+ at the surface of blood plasma exosomes in high-volume ascites ovarian cancer patients was reduced compared to that in low-volume ascites patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MMP9+/MMP2+/ EMMPRIN+ subpopulation of CD9-positive blood plasma exosomes reduced the cancer risk in CPPs. Similar data were obtained for ovarian cancer (Yunusova et al, 2019). Subpopulation of MMP9+/MMP2+/EMMPRIN+ at the surface of blood plasma exosomes in high-volume ascites ovarian cancer patients was reduced compared to that in low-volume ascites patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The morphology of blood plasma exosomes isolated from CRCPs was found to have no difference with that of patients with other cancers (Yunusova et al, 2019;Tugutova et al, 2019;Tamkovich et al, 2019). Moreover, we showed that the levels of 20S proteasomes in exosomes, MMP9+ and MMP9+/MMP2+/EMMPRIN+ exosome subpopulations in CD9-positive exosomes were significant for predicting colorectal cancer risk in CPPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The immunocytochemical identification of exosomes from plasma and total blood with monoclonal antibodies to tetraspanin CD9 was performed as described previously [ 45 ]. Quantitative analysis of the exosomal tetraspanines on the surface of the isolated EVs was carried out using flow cytometry, as described previously [ 46 ]. Flow cytometry was performed on the Cytoflex (Becman Coulter, USA), using the CytExpert 2.0 Software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For exosome immunoprecipitation and their subsequent analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), 4 µm diameter aldehyde/sulfate latex beads (Interfacial Dynamics, Portland, Oregon, USA) were incubated with purified anti-CD9 or anti-CD24 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or anti-ADAM-10 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) antibodies at 22 • C overnight, with gentle agitation as previously described [13]. For FACS analysis, 30 µg exosomes were incubated with 3 × 10 5 anti-CD9, anti-CD24 or anti-ADAM-10 beads in 150 µL of PBS at 4 • C overnight, with gentle agitation.…”
Section: Flow Cytometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%