2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-019-05527-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metallurgical Phase Transformation and Behavior of Steels Under Impact Loading

Abstract: This study deals with the mechanical behavior of the austenitic stainless steel, AISI 304, under quasi-static and impact loadings. In particular, the evolution of the transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) is investigated. Several compression tests have been performed at various strain rates under both static and impact conditions (crash tests). In order to show the influence of the strain rate on the phase transformation, the microstructures of as-received and deformed specimens have been observed with a sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim is to formulate a rupture criterion for this material for various temperatures. Another interesting perspective to carry out is considering dynamic loadings and phase transformations [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to formulate a rupture criterion for this material for various temperatures. Another interesting perspective to carry out is considering dynamic loadings and phase transformations [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model aims to describe the behavior of materials exposed to high temperatures for long-life service. As a perspective of this work, we plan to study the influence of aging on the energy absorption capacity of the material [30][31]. Indeed, the 2017A aluminum alloy is intended for use in structures that can undergo shock loads, an analysis of the failure modes as well as the evolution of the shock absorption capacity will help to optimize the strength of the 2017A alloy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After exposure to cavitation, the austenite was transformed into martensite (the total amount of martensite was 73%, while 23% residual austenite was retained). Such structural transformations are capable of improving surface properties [33] and increasing hardness [34,35]. This contributes to increasing the performance of the deposited material before the formation of microcracks, and, consequently, increasing resistance to cavitation erosion damage [36].…”
Section: Cavitation Resistance Phase Transformation and Eroded Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%