2020
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201910491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metals by Micro‐Scale Additive Manufacturing: Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties

Abstract: Many emerging applications in microscale engineering rely on the fabrication of 3D architectures in inorganic materials. Small-scale additive manufacturing (AM) aspires to provide flexible and facile access to these geometries. Yet, the synthesis of device-grade inorganic materials is still a key challenge toward the implementation of AM in microfabrication. Here, a comprehensive overview of the microstructural and mechanical properties of metals fabricated by most state-of-the-art AM methods that offer a spat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(363 reference statements)
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors argued that this is the cause for the relatively large elastic moduli comparable in value to Arnold et al's [47] e-beam curing results. It is of note that for the experiments of Reiser et al [49], homogeneous material can be expected (no core-shell pillar structures), as large area deposits in the micrometer range were measured (which necessitated e-beam scanning), in contrast to the beforehand discussed pillar geometries in this section. Summarizing the FEBID Pt-C results presented above (i), the carbon matrix dominates the elastic modulus, values from 0.06× to 2.7× of the platinum modulus were obtained, and (ii) e-beam curing offers a convenient possibility to tune the properties very precisely from compliant (approximately 10 GPa) to stiff (450 GPa) according to the application needs.…”
Section: Platinum Febid and Fibid Materialsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The authors argued that this is the cause for the relatively large elastic moduli comparable in value to Arnold et al's [47] e-beam curing results. It is of note that for the experiments of Reiser et al [49], homogeneous material can be expected (no core-shell pillar structures), as large area deposits in the micrometer range were measured (which necessitated e-beam scanning), in contrast to the beforehand discussed pillar geometries in this section. Summarizing the FEBID Pt-C results presented above (i), the carbon matrix dominates the elastic modulus, values from 0.06× to 2.7× of the platinum modulus were obtained, and (ii) e-beam curing offers a convenient possibility to tune the properties very precisely from compliant (approximately 10 GPa) to stiff (450 GPa) according to the application needs.…”
Section: Platinum Febid and Fibid Materialsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Only few materials have metal contents above 50 at.%: 86 at.% cobalt FEBID material (this work) and 80 at.% tungsten FIBID material [51] being larger than the percolation threshold together with the 95 at.% SiO 2 FIBID sample. The Au-C and Pt-C [49,90] materials have still metal contents of around 50 at.%. These high metal content materials were grouped in Figure 16b.…”
Section: Metal-carbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As metal, copper is mainly chosen for ec printing because of its coulombic efficiency (minimum faradaic losses due to side reactions) beside its importance for electronic applications. In a recent comprehensive study, the mechanically properties were compared for two benchmark structures produced with most methods mentioned in this introduction [50].…”
Section: Metal Additive Manufacturing At the Micro Scalementioning
confidence: 99%