2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metals for bone implants. Part 1. Powder metallurgy and implant rendering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(172 reference statements)
2
102
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The stiffness of the tested scaffolds varied in the range of 1.6 to 9.0 GPa, which aligns with the stiffness range of the trabecular (0.4 GPa [59,60]) and cortical bones (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)24]). The yield stress values of the scaffolds were in the range of 53 to 392 MPa, which lies in the range of cortical bones MPa [24,61]), but it is not suitable for a replacement of trabecular bone, 2-17 MPa [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The stiffness of the tested scaffolds varied in the range of 1.6 to 9.0 GPa, which aligns with the stiffness range of the trabecular (0.4 GPa [59,60]) and cortical bones (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)24]). The yield stress values of the scaffolds were in the range of 53 to 392 MPa, which lies in the range of cortical bones MPa [24,61]), but it is not suitable for a replacement of trabecular bone, 2-17 MPa [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the scaffolds having thinner struts or larger pores on their outside surface (such as U0. 4 and Dense-In) were more favorable for cell proliferation than the scaffolds having thicker struts or smaller pores on their outer surface. Given that the surface area of Dense-In and Dense-Out is identical as a result of their symmetrical design, it can be said that the cell viability was independent of surface area in this study.…”
Section: Cellular Response To Porous Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows them to be used as load-bearing implants for tissue engineering scaffolds [31]. Nevertheless, Andani et al stated that despite the flexible modulus of elasticity of NiTi, it was not straightforward to design interconnected porous structured scaffolds with this alloy because of its high melting point [32]. Even with the popularity of Ti-6Al-4V and NiTi the potentially adverse biological reaction to their elements by the living tissue still remains a matter of concern.…”
Section: Titanium and Its Alloys As Implant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NiTi-based shape memory alloys (SMAs) are excellent candidates for implant applications due to their unique shape memory effect and pseudoelasticity, good biocompatibility, high corrosion resistance, and relatively low stiffness as compared to other biomedical alloys [1][2][3]. By introducing porosity into NiTi-based SMAs, it is possible to tailor the stiffness and microstructure to more closely match that of bone as well as improve tissue and bone ingrowth [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%