2001
DOI: 10.1080/15298660108984638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metalworking Fluid Exposures in Small Machine Shops: An Overview

Abstract: Sampling was conducted in 79 small machine shops to assess airborne exposures to metalworking fluids (MWFs). Measured exposures were compared with data from the literature and exposure criteria currently recommended by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration MWF Standards Advisory Committee. Sixty-two percent of 942 personal samples collected were less than the recommended exposure limit (REL) of 0.50 mg/m3 for total particulate. However, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the higher concentrations of fungi and bacteria observed at thread-cutting sites in this survey. According to the study carried out by Piacitelli et al (2001), machines without enclosures are more hazardous in terms of exposure to MWFs than fully or partially enclosed machines. In contrast to workers who perform different tasks throughout the day, thread-cutting workers generally perform their tasks and stand near their machine until the pressing cycle is complete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with the higher concentrations of fungi and bacteria observed at thread-cutting sites in this survey. According to the study carried out by Piacitelli et al (2001), machines without enclosures are more hazardous in terms of exposure to MWFs than fully or partially enclosed machines. In contrast to workers who perform different tasks throughout the day, thread-cutting workers generally perform their tasks and stand near their machine until the pressing cycle is complete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the MMADs and GSDs for oil mist were measured between 3.8-8.2 µm and 2.2-3.7, respectively (Woskie et al 1994). In another study, the overall mean MMAD and GSD of oil mist was determined to be 4.9 µm and 2.5, respectively (Piacitelli et al 2001). In these conditions, sampling using SADS will enable effective measurement of both phases with minimal bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flooding, in which the fluid is pumped at low pressure through one or several nozzles directed at the cutting zone, is the most common application method [2]. Application of MWFs during the machining pro- * Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%