1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4526(94)00975-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamagnetic transition in Y2Cu2O5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the slope of the magnetization above 13 T for B//c does not coincide with the slope of that for B⊥c, while they usually coincide for the typical S=1/2 two sublattice antiferromagnet because the single ion type anisotropy is not expected in the S=1/2 system. However, such a deviation in the magnetization was also observed in Y 2 Cu 2 O 5 [4], and it was interpreted by the consideration of the multi-sublattice model [5]. Moreover, the magnetization result of dioptase seems to coincide with the fact that our AFMR results at 1.8 K start to deviate from the AFMR modes calculated by the two sublattice molecular field theory [6,7] above B c for B//c [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the slope of the magnetization above 13 T for B//c does not coincide with the slope of that for B⊥c, while they usually coincide for the typical S=1/2 two sublattice antiferromagnet because the single ion type anisotropy is not expected in the S=1/2 system. However, such a deviation in the magnetization was also observed in Y 2 Cu 2 O 5 [4], and it was interpreted by the consideration of the multi-sublattice model [5]. Moreover, the magnetization result of dioptase seems to coincide with the fact that our AFMR results at 1.8 K start to deviate from the AFMR modes calculated by the two sublattice molecular field theory [6,7] above B c for B//c [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…2 For the cooling run, below 100 K, the magnetic moment starts to increase significantly, indicative of strong ferromagnetic interactions. This situation could be explained by application of a model used previously to clarify the appearance of metamagnetic transitions in the antiferromagnetic phase of the R 2 Cu 2 O 5 compounds [18][19][20]. The model is essentially the molecularfield theory which assumes pairing of two neighbouring Cu 2+ spins in the copper chain along the a-axis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Special attention will be paid to the interpretation of thermal dependence of EPR susceptibility χ EPR and the product χ EPR T, which reflects the effective magnetic moment. The obtained results will be interpreted in terms of a model proposed previously to interpret the antiferromagnetic resonance spectra [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To explain the appearance of metamagnetic transitions in the antiferromagnetic phase of the R 2 Cu 2 O 5 compounds a model has been proposed assuming pairing of two neighbouring Cu 2+ spins in the copper chain along the a-axis [11][12][13]. This way chains of copper dimers S = 1 is formed, which are aligned ferromagnetically.…”
Section: Originalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The EPR results will be interpreted in frame of a model used previously to explain the metamagnetic transitions in the antiferromagnetic phase of the R 2 Cu 2 O 5 compounds [11][12][13]. …”
Section: Originalmentioning
confidence: 99%